scholarly journals Funnel trap as a method for capture migrating bats in Pape, Latvia

2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Keyword(s):  
2010 ◽  
Vol 47 (6) ◽  
pp. 1231-1234 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. L. Burke ◽  
R. Barrera ◽  
T. Kluchinsky ◽  
M. Lewis ◽  
D. M. Claborn
Keyword(s):  

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
André J. Arruda ◽  
Fernando A.O. Silveira ◽  
Elise Buisson

Abstract Seed dispersal has key implications for community dynamics and restoration ecology. However, estimating seed rain (the number and diversity of seeds arriving in a given area) is challenging, and the lack of standardization in measurement prevents cross-site comparisons. Seed trap effectiveness and accuracy of seed sorting methods are key components of seed rain estimates in need of standardization. We propose and describe a standardized protocol for evaluating the effectiveness of two seed trap types (sticky and funnel traps) and the accuracy of a seed sorting method. We used widely available seeds (arugula, quinoa, sesame and sunflower) to produce a gradient of seed size, weight and colour. Proof-of-concept was tested in a tropical grassland, where traps were set for 30 days. Our results suggest that we underestimate dispersal of seeds with less than 2 mm width that can be easily mistaken for debris and soil particles or that fail to adhere to sticky traps. Seeds on sticky traps may be more vulnerable to removal by wind and rain, whereas seeds in funnel traps are more susceptible to decay. We found no evidence of observer bias on seed sorting for funnel trap samples. However, accuracy on seed sorting for funnel trap samples tended to decline for seeds with less than 2 mm width, suggesting a size-dependence in seed retrieval success. Our standardized protocol addressing trap effectiveness and seed sorting methods will increase the reliability of data obtained in seed rain studies and allow more reliable comparisons between datasets.


2012 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 49-58 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen H. Bennett ◽  
Jayme L. Waldron ◽  
Shane M. Welch

2014 ◽  
Vol 86 (11) ◽  
pp. 5295-5299 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yehia M. Ibrahim ◽  
Sandilya V. B. Garimella ◽  
Aleksey V. Tolmachev ◽  
Erin S. Baker ◽  
Richard D. Smith

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (2) ◽  
pp. 99-106
Author(s):  
Sung-Soo Yoon ◽  
Myung-Hyun Kim ◽  
Jinu Eo ◽  
Soon-Ik Kwon ◽  
Hyung-Kyu Nam ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 29 (3) ◽  
pp. 413-423 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giles Hardy ◽  
Patricia Fleming ◽  
Michael Craig ◽  
Christine Davis ◽  
Andrew Grigg

Abstract Small arboreal reptiles can be difficult to capture, except in traps, and the physical trap characteristics, drift-fence and bait are critical factors that can influence the efficacy of any trap. We conducted experiments on marbled geckoes (Christinus marmoratus, Gekkonidae) and wall skinks (Cryptoblepharus plagiocephalus, Scincidae) that examined bait preferences, attractiveness of different visual and acoustic cues and efficacy of different drift-fence materials to develop a trap for small arboreal reptiles. The experiments showed that both marbled geckos and wall skinks preferred crickets as bait, that wall skinks avoided darkness/cover and that both species had difficulty climbing flashing material covered in oil. This led us to develop an arboreal trap that was made from transparent material, used crickets as bait and had drift-fences constructed from flashing material. When used in the field, the final trap design was effective in capturing arboreal reptiles.


2009 ◽  
Vol 141 (4) ◽  
pp. 422-424 ◽  
Author(s):  
Niklas Björklund

AbstractA simple and inexpensive non-destructive trap to catch insects as they ascend tree boles is described. The trap was tested in a capture–mark–recapture experiment on the Warren root collar weevil, Hylobius warreni Wood. A high percentage (77%) of marked H. warreni were recaptured at least once during a 12-day period and 54% were recaptured more than once, with one weevil recaptured eight times.


2000 ◽  
Vol 35 (1) ◽  
pp. 77-82 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kenneth W. McCravy ◽  
John T. Nowak ◽  
G. Keith Douce ◽  
C. Wayne Berisford

Pheromone-baited traps are frequently used for research or in monitoring populations of bark beetles such as the southern pine beetle, Dendroctonus frontalis Zimmermann, and Ips spp. which are important pests of southern pines. We compared the effectiveness of two commercially available trap designs, the multiple-funnel trap and the slot trap, for collection of D. frontalis, three species of Ips, and two of their common predators. Slot traps captured greater numbers of bark beetles while multiple-funnel traps captured more predators. Multiple-funnel traps were judged to be easier to transport and check in the field. This study indicates that slot traps are preferable for monitoring southern bark beetles with the least disruption to natural enemy populations, while multiple-funnel traps are better for monitoring bark beetle/predator ratios. Due to ease of checking and handling, multiple-funnel traps are preferable for uses that involve large numbers of traps, long-distance manual hauling, or frequent relocation of traps.


2008 ◽  
Vol 80 (3) ◽  
pp. 612-623 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian H. Clowers ◽  
Yehia M. Ibrahim ◽  
David C. Prior ◽  
William F. Danielson ◽  
Mikhail E. Belov ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document