scholarly journals A Prospective Evaluation of a Nurse-Led Stent Removal Service Using the Single-Use Isiris® in a Tertiary Referral Stone Unit and its Impact on Patient Waiting Times

2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. e45-e53
Author(s):  
Niyukta Thakare ◽  
Jane Collie ◽  
Syed Shah ◽  
Sami Al-Hayek ◽  
Jordan Durrant ◽  
...  

Background and ObjectiveDouble J (JJ) ureteric stenting represents one of the most significant causes of patient discomfort and dissat-isfaction following endourological procedures. At our institution, a large tertiary referral centre for complex stones, standard JJ stent removal was previously undertaken with a flexible cystoscope (FC) in the endoscopy department by a doctor. The pathway was prone to delays through capacity constraints and prioritization being given to cancer investigations. The Isiris® is a single-use stent removal system consisting of a ‘camera on chip’ disposable FC with an integrated grasper. We examine the feasibility of a nurse-led stent removal service using Isiris®, performed as an office-based procedure, and its effect on waiting times. Material and MethodsA specialist stone nurse undertook training in FC approved by the British Association of Urological Surgeons (BAUS) and the British Association of Urological Nurses (BAUN). Once competency was reached, a nurse-led service was offered to patients in the outpatient setting. A prospective database from April 2018 to March 2020 was maintained to include patient data for stent removals in the nurse-led clinic using Isiris®. This was compared to a retrospective dataset of FC and stent removal between July 2016 and December 2016, per-formed by a doctor in the endoscopy department. The delays in stent removal compared to the ‘ideal’ stent removal date (planned date plus or minus 3 days tolerance allowed) were compared between the two pathways. ResultsThe specialist nurse undertook BAUS theory training and competency was reached using an approved BAUS/BAUN competency package. 414 stent removals were booked in the nurse group, of which 395 were undertaken. 291 of 395 (74%) patients in the nurse removal Isiris® group had their stent removed on time, whereas only 16 of 54 (30%) patients had their stents removed on time in the FC stent removal group. A delay of more than 21 days was seen in 22% of FC group vs only 2% in the nurse-led Isiris® group. Both planned removal and actual stent dwell time were longer in the FC group compared to Isiris® group (p < 0.0001). There were no major complications with the use of Isiris® for stent removal in the nurse-led clinic. ConclusionThis study has demonstrated that it is feasible to introduce a nurse-led stent removal service. The introduction of this service using the Isiris® system has led to a reduction in delays of stent removal, which is likely to trans-late into significant quality of life improvement for patients and economic benefits for the healthcare system.

2019 ◽  
Vol 201 (Supplement 4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jane Collie* ◽  
Syed Shah ◽  
Samih Al-Hayek ◽  
Jordan Durrant ◽  
Kasra Saeb-Parsy ◽  
...  

CHEST Journal ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 150 (4) ◽  
pp. 1314A
Author(s):  
Rucha Dagaonkar ◽  
Dominic Marshall ◽  
Yeow Chan ◽  
Anura Peters ◽  
Kin Tan Siew ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 95-102
Author(s):  
Esther Z Barsom ◽  
Anne Sophie H M van Dalen ◽  
Marjolein Blussé van Oud-Alblas ◽  
Christianne J Buskens ◽  
Anthony W H van de Ven ◽  
...  

ObjectivesTelephone consultations are frequently used in the outpatient setting in order to avoid unnecessary travel and to reduce hospital visit-related costs for patients. However, they are limited by the absence of non-verbal communication in contrast to video consultation. Little is known considering the possible advantages of using video consultation in comparison to telephone consultation according to both patients and healthcare providers.MethodsPatients with colorectal diseases were asked to choose between a telephone consultation or a video consultation for their next appointment at the outpatient clinic of a tertiary referral centre. Willingness to use video consultation, value of non-verbal communication, patient satisfaction, provider satisfaction and user friendliness of the video connection technology were measured using questionnaires.ResultsNone of the included patients ever had a video consultation before with a healthcare provider. Nonetheless, 22/50 preferred a video consultation over a telephone consultation. Patients who preferred a video consultation underlined the benefits of providing visual feedback to both patients and healthcare providers. Moreover, healthcare providers felt they were better able to assess the patients’ healthcare condition.ConclusionFor patients who value both verbal and non-verbal interaction and feel comfortable with the use of video consultation, video consultation is the preferred contact modality. Shared decision making should be used to choose the preferred interaction modality. For patients with low digital skills, support might be needed or video consultation may not be the preferred choice.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document