scholarly journals The unions of dense metrizable subspaces with certain local properties

Filomat ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 83-88
Author(s):  
A.V. Arhangel’skii ◽  
S. Tokgöz

Many important examples of topological spaces can be represented as a union of a finite or countable collection of metrizable subspaces. However, it is far from clear which spaces in general can be obtained in this way. Especially interesting is the case when the subspaces are dense in the union. We present below several results in this direction. In particular, we show that if a Tychonoff space X is the union of a countable family of dense metrizable locally compact subspaces, then X itself is metrizable and locally compact. We also prove a similar result for metrizable locally separable spaces. Notice in this connection that the union of two dense metrizable subspaces needn?t be metrizable. Indeed, this is witnessed by a well-known space constructed by R.W. Heath.

1977 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 199-207 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bridget Bos Baird

All topological spaces here are assumed to be T2. The collection F(Y)of all homeomorphisms whose domains and ranges are closed subsets of a topological space Y is an inverse semigroup under the operation of composition. We are interested in the general problem of getting some information about the subsemigroups of F(Y) whenever Y is a compact metric space. Here, we specifically look at the problem of determining those spaces X with the property that F(X) is isomorphic to a subsemigroup of F(Y). The main result states that if X is any first countable space with an uncountable number of points, then the semigroup F(X) can be embedded into the semigroup F(Y) if and only if either X is compact and Y contains a copy of X, or X is noncompact and locally compact and Y contains a copy of the one-point compactification of X.


2019 ◽  
Vol 69 (5) ◽  
pp. 979-988
Author(s):  
Jissy Nsonde Nsayi

Abstract Two problems concerning EF-frames and EZ-frames are investigated. In [Some new classes of topological spaces and annihilator ideals, Topology Appl. 165 (2014), 84–97], Tahirefar defines a Tychonoff space X to be an EF (resp., EZ)-space if disjoint unions of clopen sets are completely separated (resp., every regular closed subset is the closure of a union of clopen subsets). By extending these notions to locales, we give several characterizations of EF and EZ-frames, mostly in terms of certain ring-theoretic properties of 𝓡 L, the ring of real-valued continuous functions on L. We end by defining a qsz-frame which is a pointfree context of qsz-space and, give a characterization of these frames in terms of rings of real-valued continuous functions on L.


2017 ◽  
Vol 97 (1) ◽  
pp. 110-118 ◽  
Author(s):  
SAAK S. GABRIYELYAN ◽  
SIDNEY A. MORRIS

For a Tychonoff space $X$, let $\mathbb{V}(X)$ be the free topological vector space over $X$, $A(X)$ the free abelian topological group over $X$ and $\mathbb{I}$ the unit interval with its usual topology. It is proved here that if $X$ is a subspace of $\mathbb{I}$, then the following are equivalent: $\mathbb{V}(X)$ can be embedded in $\mathbb{V}(\mathbb{I})$ as a topological vector subspace; $A(X)$ can be embedded in $A(\mathbb{I})$ as a topological subgroup; $X$ is locally compact.


1954 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 163-171 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ernest Michael

1988 ◽  
Vol 53 (3) ◽  
pp. 785-795 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jörg Flum ◽  
Juan Carlos Martinez

AbstractLet L be one of the topological languages Lt, (L∞ω)t and (Lκω)t. We characterize the topological spaces which are models of the L-theory of the class of ordinals equipped with the order topology. The results show that the role played in classical model theory by the property of being well-ordered is taken over in the topological context by the property of being locally compact and scattered.


2012 ◽  
Vol 11 (01) ◽  
pp. 1250014 ◽  
Author(s):  
PAPIYA BHATTACHARJEE

This paper studies algebraic frames L and the set Min (L) of minimal prime elements of L. We will endow the set Min (L) with two well-known topologies, known as the Hull-kernel (or Zariski) topology and the inverse topology, and discuss several properties of these two spaces. It will be shown that Min (L) endowed with the Hull-kernel topology is a zero-dimensional, Hausdorff space; whereas, Min (L) endowed with the inverse topology is a T1, compact space. The main goal will be to find conditions on L for the spaces Min (L) and Min (L)-1 to have various topological properties; for example, compact, locally compact, Hausdorff, zero-dimensional, and extremally disconnected. We will also discuss when the two topological spaces are Boolean and Stone spaces.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document