Blenner v. Vim Motor Truck Co. June 14, 1923. [117 S. E. 834.]

doi:10.2307/1108570

Fitting Motor Truck Rims

Scientific American ◽

10.1038/scientificamerican01221916-51bsupp ◽

1916 ◽

Vol 81 (2090supp) ◽

pp. 51-51

Keyword(s):

Motor Truck

Features of 1916 Motor Truck Design

Scientific American ◽

10.1038/scientificamerican03041916-250 ◽

1916 ◽

Vol 114 (10) ◽

pp. 250-251

Author(s):

Victor W. Pagé

Keyword(s):

Motor Truck

The Motor Truck in Relation to Fruit and Vegetable Marketing

Journal of Farm Economics ◽

10.2307/1231120 ◽

1936 ◽

Vol 18 (2) ◽

pp. 372

Author(s):

M. P. Rasmussen

Keyword(s):

Fruit And Vegetable ◽

Motor Truck

MOTOR TRUCK CHASSIS DESIGN

10.4271/190024 ◽

1919 ◽

Author(s):

Cornelius T Myers

Keyword(s):

Motor Truck ◽

Truck Chassis

The Trend of Motor Truck Design for 1921

Scientific American ◽

10.1038/scientificamerican01081921-30 ◽

1921 ◽

Vol 124 (2) ◽

pp. 30-31

Author(s):

Victor W. Pagé

Keyword(s):

Motor Truck

Motor Truck in Snowbound Streets —A Correction

Scientific American ◽

10.1038/scientificamerican03281914-272 ◽

1914 ◽

Vol 110 (13) ◽

pp. 272-272

Keyword(s):

Motor Truck

Discussion of “The Motor Truck as an Asset to Railroad Operation”

Transactions of the American Society of Civil Engineers ◽

10.1061/taceat.0003082 ◽

1922 ◽

Vol 85 (1) ◽

pp. 1082-1097

Author(s):

T. Hugh Boorman ◽

Samuel Whinery ◽

John C. Trautwine ◽

Eugene W. Stern ◽

Henry Goldmark ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Motor Truck ◽

Railroad Operation

THE NEW SPRAGUE ELECTRIC-MOTOR TRUCK

Science ◽

10.1126/science.ns-12.305.266 ◽

1888 ◽

Vol ns-12 (305) ◽

pp. 266-267

Keyword(s):

Electric Motor ◽

Motor Truck

Spike Driving by Motor Truck

Scientific American ◽

10.1038/scientificamerican11181911-454 ◽

1911 ◽

Vol 105 (21) ◽

pp. 454-454

Keyword(s):

Motor Truck

Support Possibilities for 3D Scanning of Forging Tools with Deep and Slim Impressions for an Evaluation of Wear by Means of Replication Methods

Materials ◽

10.3390/ma13081881 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 13 (8) ◽

pp. 1881 ◽

Cited By ~ 3

Author(s):

Marek Hawryluk ◽

Zbigniew Gronostajski ◽

Jacek Ziemba ◽

Marta Janik ◽

Piotr Górski ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Measurement Error ◽

Laser Light ◽

3D Scanning ◽

Normal Direction ◽

Scanning Method ◽

Forward Extrusion ◽

Motor Truck ◽

Reflection Angle ◽

Maximum Angle ◽

Deep Cavities

This article discusses the problems related to the use of non-contact 3D scanning techniques and their support by means of replication methods for the analysis of the geometrical changes in deep tool impressions used for the forward extrusion of valve-type elements assigned for motor truck engines. The 3D scanning method, despite its unquestionable advantages, also has certain limitations, such as scanning the inner surfaces of deep cavities. This is caused by the fact that the larger the angle between the reflected laser light and the normal direction to the measured surface, the larger the area covered for the analysis, yet at the same time, the higher the measurement error. The authors performed an analysis of the geometrical loss of the tools as well as the corresponding replication masses, together with a discussion of the results related to minimization of the measuring errors. For the analyzed tool, the maximum angle during direct scanning was 40 degrees, which unfortunately does not enable an analysis of the entire pattern, while for larger angles, it is necessary to make the measurement by indirect scanning, i.e., by replicating the cavity imprint of the tool. Therefore, for a given geometry, the reflection angle should be determined individually.