Crop Insurance, Moral Hazard, and Agricultural Chemical Use

1996 ◽  
Vol 78 (2) ◽  
pp. 428-438 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vincent H. Smith ◽  
Barry K. Goodwin
1997 ◽  
Vol 48 (1-3) ◽  
pp. 393-407 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles E. Hyde ◽  
James A. Vercammen

1994 ◽  
Vol 76 (2) ◽  
pp. 250-261 ◽  
Author(s):  
James Vercammen ◽  
G. Cornelis Kooten
Keyword(s):  

2006 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 381-390 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael J. Roberts ◽  
Nigel Key ◽  
Erik O'Donoghue

1997 ◽  
Vol 79 (1) ◽  
pp. 216-226 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keith H. Coble ◽  
Thomas O. Knight ◽  
Rulon D. Pope ◽  
Jeffery R. Williams
Keyword(s):  

2019 ◽  
Vol 51 (02) ◽  
pp. 315-327 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher N. Boyer ◽  
S. Aaron Smith

AbstractPrevented planting provision in crop insurance protects producers from failure to plant attributable to natural causes. We determined the impact of this provision at various crop insurance coverage levels on prevented planting claims and ex post moral hazard. The moral hazard incentive in the prevented planting provision is stronger for corn than soybeans. Reducing the prevented planting coverage factor for corn could likely reduce moral hazard, but the degree of the reduction will likely depend on the revenue protection coverage level. Conversely, we found moral hazard is unlikely to occur for soybean production regardless of the revenue protection coverage level.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document