scholarly journals Constitutional Law: Commerce Clause: Federal Jurisdiction in Trade-Mark Infringement Proceedings under the Lanham Act

1955 ◽  
Vol 53 (5) ◽  
pp. 745
Author(s):  
Richard R. Dailey
Keyword(s):  
Constitutional Law ◽  
Trade Mark ◽  
Trade Mark Infringement ◽  
Commerce Clause ◽  
Lanham Act ◽  
Federal Jurisdiction

US Supreme Court holds willfulness unnecessary for award of profits in trade mark infringement case

2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (7) ◽  
pp. 497-499
Author(s):  
Bruce McDonald
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Trade Mark ◽  
Trade Mark Infringement ◽  
The Us ◽  
Us Supreme Court ◽  
Lanham Act

Abstract Romag Fasteners, Inc v Fossil, Inc, No 18–1233, --- S.Ct. ----, 2020 WL 1942012 (23 April 2020) On 23 April 2020, the US Supreme Court held that a trade mark infringement plaintiff is not required to prove that a defendant acted ‘willfully’ in order to recover profits as an equitable remedy under section 35(a) of the Federal Trademark Act of 1946 (the ‘Lanham Act’), 15 USC s 1117(a).

Keywords, search engines, and the potential for trade mark infringement

2009 ◽  
Vol 4 (9) ◽  
pp. 614-616
Author(s):  
A. Sharples
Keyword(s):  
Search Engines ◽  
Trade Mark ◽  
Trade Mark Infringement

Red Bull v The Bull Dog: 'due cause' in trade mark infringement

2014 ◽  
Vol 9 (8) ◽  
pp. 621-623 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. Smith
Keyword(s):  
Trade Mark ◽  
Trade Mark Infringement ◽  
Red Bull

Article 81 is a defence to a plea of trade mark infringement

2006 ◽  
Vol 1 (9) ◽  
pp. 570-572
Author(s):  
J. Jones
Keyword(s):  
Trade Mark ◽  
Trade Mark Infringement
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document