Lessons from Research on Dyslexia: Implications for a Classification System for Learning Disabilities

1998 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 167-178 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Yancey Padget

Specific reading disability/dyslexia is examined as the one type of learning disability for which research results are complete and consistent enough to suggest a model. The implications of this model are then considered for all achievement domains and a total of three types of learning disabilities (LD) emerge—specific language impairment, specific reading disability/dyslexia, and specific math disability. When the core symptoms and the secondary symptoms for these types of learning disabilities are considered separately, it becomes evident that these three types of learning disabilities can account for discrepancies in all of the academic domains included in federal and state definitions of LD. This resulting classification system links the findings from recent LD research, syndromes from neuropsychology, and the criteria that school districts are mandated to operationalize. The implications of the proposed classification system are discussed in relation to prevalence, diagnosis, and intervention.

2000 ◽  
Vol 41 (7) ◽  
pp. 869-874 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. M. McArthur ◽  
J. H. Hogben ◽  
V. T. Edwards ◽  
S. M. Heath ◽  
E. D. Mengler

1990 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 50-56
Author(s):  
Abdul-Kader F. Farrag ◽  
Abdul-Rakeeb A. El-Behary

2017 ◽  
Vol 60 (9) ◽  
pp. 2680-2686 ◽  
Author(s):  
Krystal L. Werfel ◽  
Hannah Krimm

Purpose The purpose of this preliminary study was to (a) compare the pattern of reading subtypes among a clinical sample of children with specific language impairment (SLI) and children with typical language and (b) evaluate phonological and nonphonological language deficits within each reading impairment subtype. Method Participants were 32 children with SLI and 39 children with typical language in Grades 2 through 4. Each child was classified as demonstrating 1 of 4 reading subtypes on the basis of word-level and text-level skills: typical reading, dyslexia, specific reading comprehension impairment, or garden variety reading impairment. In addition, phonological and nonphonological language skills were evaluated. Results Children with SLI were more likely to exhibit reading impairments than children with typical language. Children with SLI were more likely to exhibit text-level deficits than children with typical language. Phonological language deficits were observed in children with word-level deficits, and nonphonological language deficits were observed in children with text-level deficits. Conclusions The results indicate that the patterns of reading subtypes differ among children with SLI and children with typical language. The findings highlight the importance of simultaneously but separately considering word-level and text-level skills in studies of reading impairment.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document