Formal Organizations: A Comparative Approach. By Peter M. Blau and Richard W. Scott. (San Francisco: Chandler Publishing Co., 1962. Pp. x, 312. $5.25.)

1962 ◽  
Vol 56 (2) ◽  
pp. 428-429
Author(s):  
Harold Guetzkow
Author(s):  
Davide Celoria ◽  
David Hemphill

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to examine the practice of new principal coaching in schools from the coaches’ perspective. Design/methodology/approach – Six coaches of new principals were interviewed over a one-year period. Through the use of a qualitative, constant-comparative approach, the participants’ voices were used to discover their views. Data analysis employed emergent coding (Creswell, 2008; Denzin, 2005; Glaser and Strauss, 1998; Spradley, 1979). The study took place in the San Francisco Bay Area, a linguistically and ethnically diverse area, in the state of California, USA. Findings – Thematic analysis of interview data from principal coaches revealed a process-oriented focus within principal coaching as a primary finding. Process-oriented coaching, rather than specific, skill-focussed content, was the main mechanism coaches used to support new principals. Research limitations/implications – Findings are limited to the sample of principal coaches used for this analysis, although there are potential applications to similar school settings in other locations. Researchers are encouraged to examine new principal coaching in other contexts. Practical implications – The results of this inquiry point to the importance of process skills in new principal coaching, suggest the need for new approaches in principal mentoring programs, and call for further research on specific process tools in coaching to promote reflection and inquiry. Originality/value – The paper identifies process-oriented coaching as a valuable support mechanism for new principals, particularly during their first year in the role.


1962 ◽  
Vol 27 (5) ◽  
pp. 711
Author(s):  
Roland J. Pellegrin ◽  
Peter M. Blau ◽  
W. Richard Scott

1963 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 220
Author(s):  
P. Rolle ◽  
Peter M. Blau ◽  
W. Richard Scott

1962 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 123 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stanley H. Udy ◽  
Peter M. Blau ◽  
W. Richard Scott

1962 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. 185
Author(s):  
Titus Thole ◽  
Peter M. Blau ◽  
W. Richard Scott

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 55
Author(s):  
Teddy Yee Fang

Asian Americans have become a major factor in the debate over affirmative action and college/school admission policies. Yet most often their role is relegated to one side or the other of the argument - either grouped with other oppressed minorities, or else grouped with privileged white students. However, Asian Americans have their own agency and self-determination that requires attention. Beginning in the 1990s, San Francisco’s Asian American community resisted mainstream hegemony and charted their own course forward.  This study uses a comparative approach towards these early Asian American activists, comparing and contrasting their motivations and actions with Black activists of the time, and also with a respected federal judge, scion of one of San Francisco’s wealthiest and traditional legal dynasties. News articles, notes and newsletters of Chinese American activist groups, internal school district reports, and 24 interviews are used to express how early generations of Asian Americans stood up to fight when they felt their version of the American dream was under attack, and how they focused on present-day tactical actions instead of future-looking strategies or past historical experiences. This study also reveals practical principles that these specifically Chinese American activists employed which may have applications for all groups resisting domination and/or assimilation. The methods and tactics employed by these second-generation Asian Americans that grew up in a community remade by the 1965 Immigration Act, helps us understand how the Asian American community has developed since then, and how it is continuing to move forward.  


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document