Giving for Social Change: Foundations, Public Policy, and the American Political Agenda.

Social Forces ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 75 (1) ◽  
pp. 353
Author(s):  
Susan A. Ostrander ◽  
Althea K. Nagai ◽  
Robert Lerner ◽  
Stanley Rothman
1994 ◽  
Vol 109 (5) ◽  
pp. 939
Author(s):  
Richard Magat ◽  
Althea K. Nagai ◽  
Robert Lerner ◽  
Stanley Rothman

1995 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 352
Author(s):  
Phoebe H. Cottingham ◽  
Althea K. Nagai ◽  
Robert Lerner ◽  
Stanley Rothman

2016 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 253-267 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rosana Maria NOGUEIRA ◽  
Bruna BARONE ◽  
Thiara Teixeira de BARROS ◽  
Kátia Regina Leoni Silva Lima de Queiroz GUIMARÃES ◽  
Nilo Sérgio Sabbião RODRIGUES ◽  
...  

School meals were introduced in the Brazilian political agenda by a group of scholars known as nutrition scientists' in the 1940s. In 1955, the Campanha de Merenda Escolar, the first official school food program, was stablished, and sixty years after its inception, school food in Brazil stands as a decentralised public policy, providing services to students enrolled in public schools, which involve the Brazilian federal government, twentyseven federative units, and their 5,570 municipalities. Throughout its history, school food has gone through many stages that reflect the social transformations in Brazil: from a campaign to implement school food focused on the problem of malnutrition and the ways to solve it, to the creation of a universal public policy relying on social participation and interface between other modern, democratic, and sustainable policies, establishing a strategy for promoting food and nutrition security, development, and social protection. In this article, the School Food Program is analyzed from the perspective of four basic structures that support it as public policy: the formal structure, consisting of legal milestones that regulated the program; substantive structure, referring to the public and private social actors involved; material structure, regarding the way in which Brazil sponsors the program; and finally, the symbolic structure, consisting of knowledge, values, interests, and rules that legitimatize the policy.


2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew Fisher

Abstract Background Wellbeing is seen as a matter of concern for governments and public policy. However, current theories on wellbeing are not well placed to inform this concern, because they fail to take account of and explain evidence on social determinants of mental health. Discussion This article proposes a new theory of public wellbeing which does takes account of such evidence, by explaining the role of stress within three basic functions of social cognition. Building on this description, the article then proposes that wellbeing consists in seven basic abilities, which are always developed and exercised (or not) through constant processes of interaction between individual and environment. The article explains why contemporary theories on wellbeing are poorly placed to inform public policy for wellbeing. It also positions the proposed theory in relation to evidence on social determinants of health (SDH) and the associated public policy agenda. It is argued the proposed theory of wellbeing extends on and challenges the SDH policy agenda in relation to the normative target of policy proposals, factors identified as determinants, impacts of determinants on populations, and proposals for political and social change. Conclusion Improved theory on public wellbeing can inform policy for wellbeing because it explains the contingent nature of wellbeing within contemporary social environments, and extends understanding of social determinants of wellbeing.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document