Lectures in Abstract Algebra. II: Linear Algebra

1955 ◽  
Vol 39 (327) ◽  
pp. 76
Author(s):  
W. Ledermann ◽  
Nathan Jacobson
Elements ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Arthur Diep-Nguyen

In this paper, we discuss strings of 3’s and 7’s, hereby dubbed “dreibens.” As a first step towards determining whether the set of prime dreibens is infinite, we examine the properties of dreibens when divided by 7. by determining the divisibility of a dreiben by 7, we can rule out some composite dreibens in the search for prime dreibens. We are concerned with the number of dreibens of length n that leave a remainder i when divided by 7. By using number theory, linear algebra, and abstract algebra, we arrive at a formula that tells us how many dreibens of length n are divisible by 7. We also find a way to determine the number of dreibens of length n that leave a remainder i when divided by 7. Further investigation from a combinatorial perspective provides additional insight into the properties of dreibens when divided by 7. Overall, this paper helps characterize dreibens, opens up more paths of inquiry into the nature of dreibens, and rules out some composite dreibens from a prime dreiben search.


1936 ◽  
Vol 37 (2) ◽  
pp. 265 ◽  
Author(s):  
Oystein Ore
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Paola Cantù

After recalling some mathematical contributions that are relevant for the structuralist transformation of mathematics, such as abstract algebra, linear algebra, and number theory, this chapter reconstructs Grassmann’s philosophy of mathematics. It is claimed that he contributed to the development of methodological structuralism inasmuch as he clearly separated the study of the most general properties of connections from pure and applied mathematics, basing them on an understanding of generality as conceptual underdetermination, and on the preeminence of the notion of series over that of function. A brief comparison with contemporary philosophical structuralism will clarify Grassmann’s tendency toward a “concept structuralism” rather than an “object structuralism.”


Cybernetics ◽  
1983 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
pp. 288-304 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. N. Faddeeva ◽  
D. K. Faddeev

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frederick Greenleaf ◽  
Sophie Marques
Keyword(s):  

1975 ◽  
Vol 68 (2) ◽  
pp. 99-106
Author(s):  
Zalman Usiskin

The subfield of pure mathematics that has grown most significantly in the past few decades is that of algebra, by which is meant “higher” or “abstract” algebra and linear algebra. Twenty years ago courses in algebra were at the advanced undergraduate and graduate level, and it was easy to become a certified mathematics teacher without having any knowledge of groups, rings, fields, or vector spaces. Today virtually all prospective teachers take a course in which some of these structures are studied.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document