Test-Wiseness and Multiple-Choice Accounting Questions: Implications for Instructors

Author(s):  
Charles D. Bailey ◽  
John W. Briggs ◽  
James H. Irving

This study examines “test-wiseness” rules-of-thumb accounting students may use when they cannot answer a multiple-choice question. The effectiveness of the rules is poorly understood, but they rely largely on preventable flaws in question design. After identifying eleven relevant rules, we had graduate research assistants employ the rules on unfamiliar material, to test whether the rules can be effective when used by capable students who have not studied the material. Three of the rules demonstrate positive results, and participants are able to recognize the more valuable ones. Additionally, we survey accounting majors at two universities to assess general familiarity and belief in the rules. We find that they have well-formed ideas of the relative usefulness, which are consistent between universities. The results provide some insights into the issues question writers should consider, so as to avoid vulnerability to test-wiseness or even turn the rules to their advantage when composing questions.

2017 ◽  
Vol 32 (4) ◽  
pp. 1-17 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dianne Massoudi ◽  
SzeKee Koh ◽  
Phillip J. Hancock ◽  
Lucia Fung

ABSTRACT In this paper we investigate the effectiveness of an online learning resource for introductory financial accounting students using a suite of online multiple choice questions (MCQ) for summative and formative purposes. We found that the availability and use of an online resource resulted in improved examination performance for those students who actively used the online learning resource. Further, we found a positive relationship between formative MCQ and unit content related to challenging financial accounting concepts. However, better examination performance was also linked to other factors, such as prior academic performance, tutorial participation, and demographics, including gender and attending university as an international student. JEL Classifications: I20; M41.


Author(s):  
Casey Wong ◽  
Paul Denny ◽  
Andrew Luxton-Reilly ◽  
Jacqueline Whalley

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document