scholarly journals Anterior openbite malocclusion in adults: Treatment stability and patient satisfaction in National Dental Practice-Based Research Network patients

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Gu ◽  
Brian Leroux ◽  
Sam Finkleman ◽  
Lauren Todoki ◽  
Geoffrey Greenlee ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT Objectives To investigate stability and satisfaction in adult anterior open bite (AOB) patients at least 9 months post-treatment, as well as patient and practitioner factors that may be associated with stability and satisfaction. Materials and Methods Practitioners and their adult AOB patients were recruited through the National Dental Practice-Based Research Network. Data on patient and practitioner characteristics, treatment recommendations and factors were previously collected. Treatment stability was determined by assessing post-treatment intraoral photographs. Patient satisfaction was determined from post-treatment questionnaires. Treatment was categorized into aligners, fixed appliances, temporary anchorage devices, and orthognathic surgery. Extractions were also investigated. Retention type was categorized into vacuum-formed, Hawley-style, or bonded retainers, and regimens were classified as full-time or part-time wear. Results Retention data collected from 112 patients had a mean post-treatment time of 1.21 years. There were no statistically significant differences in stability between treatment groups. Depending on whether a qualitative index or a millimetric measure was employed, stability ranged from 65% to 89%. Extractions and less initial lower incisor proclination were associated with higher stability in patients treated with fixed appliances only. High satisfaction was reported by patients at retention. There were no clear differences in stability or satisfaction among retention types or regimens. Conclusions The stability of adult AOB orthodontic treatment was high, regardless of treatment or retainer modality. Satisfaction in adult AOB patients was high, regardless of retention type or regimen.

2020 ◽  
Vol 158 (6) ◽  
pp. e121-e136
Author(s):  
Samuel A. Finkleman ◽  
Lauren S. Todoki ◽  
Ellen Funkhouser ◽  
Geoffrey M. Greenlee ◽  
Kelly W. Choi ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 88 (6) ◽  
pp. 675-683 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kelly W. Choi ◽  
Hsiu-Ching Ko ◽  
Lauren S. Todoki ◽  
Samuel A. Finkleman ◽  
Roozbeh Khosravi ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT Objectives: To describe the demographic and practice characteristics of the clinicians enrolled in a large, prospective cohort study examining recommendations and treatment for adult anterior open bite (AOB) and the relationship between these characteristics and practitioners' self-reported treatment preferences. The characteristics of the AOB patients recruited were also described. Materials and Methods: Practitioners were recruited from the National Dental Practice-Based Research Network. Participants in the study consisted of practitioners and their adult AOB patients in active treatment. Upon enrollment, practitioners completed questionnaires enquiring about demographics, treatment preferences for adult AOB patients, and treatment recommendations for each patient. Patients completed questionnaires on demographics and factors related to treatment. Results: Ninety-one practitioners and 347 patients were recruited. Demographic characteristics of recruited orthodontists were similar to those of American Association of Orthodontists members. The great majority of practitioners reported using fixed appliances and elastics frequently for adult AOB patients. Only a third of practitioners reported using aligners frequently for adult AOB patients, and 10% to 13% frequently recommended temporary anchorage devices (TADs) or orthognathic surgery. Seventy-four percent of the patients were female, and the mean age was 31.4 years. The mean pretreatment overbite was −2.4 mm, and the mean mandibular plane angle was 38.8°. Almost 40% of patients had undergone orthodontic treatment previously. Conclusions: This article presents the demographic data for 91 doctors and 347 adult AOB patients, as well as the practitioners' self-reported treatment preferences.


2020 ◽  
Vol 158 (6) ◽  
pp. e137-e150 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lauren S. Todoki ◽  
Samuel A. Finkleman ◽  
Ellen Funkhouser ◽  
Geoffrey M. Greenlee ◽  
Kelly W. Choi ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 156 ◽  
pp. e145
Author(s):  
Jenna L. McCauley ◽  
Valeria V. Gordan ◽  
Joseph L. Riley ◽  
Roger B. Fillingim ◽  
Sonia K. Makhija ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 141 (7) ◽  
pp. 889-899 ◽  
Author(s):  
Timothy A. DeRouen ◽  
Joana Cunha-Cruz ◽  
Thomas J. Hilton ◽  
Jack Ferracane ◽  
Joel Berg ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 74 (4) ◽  
pp. 276-282 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ellen Funkhouser ◽  
Jeffrey L. Fellows ◽  
Valeria V. Gordan ◽  
D. Brad Rindal ◽  
Patrick J. Foy ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 28 (2) ◽  
pp. 122-130 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael S. McCracken ◽  
Mark S. Litaker ◽  
Valeria V. Gordan ◽  
Thomas Karr ◽  
Ellen Sowell ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 48 (3) ◽  
pp. 200-207 ◽  
Author(s):  
S.K. Makhija ◽  
G.H. Gilbert ◽  
E. Funkhouser ◽  
J.D. Bader ◽  
V.V. Gordan ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document