Abstract
Background
Sickle cell disease (SCD) is an inherited hematologic disorder that affects approximately 100,000 Americans and results in over 200,000 emergency departments visits annually, largely due to pain (Lanzkron et al). Delay in treatment in emergency room has been a significant barrier to patients with SCD, particularly adults. The objective of this study is to determine the effects of utilizing individualized pain plans for the treatment of vaso-occlusive crisis (VOC) on the satisfaction of healthcare providers in the emergency department (ED).
Methods
The Ohio State University has a comprehensive sickle cell center which creates individualized pain plans for patients who present to the ED with pain related to VOC. In January 2015, these pain plans were implemented into the electronic medical record listed in the overview of the problem sickle cell disease in each chart. In addition to creating pain plans, an interdisciplinary team was formed consisting of hematologists, pharmacists, and ED providers with the goal of education regarding SCD and the new implementation of pain plans. Surveys, using the secure web application, RedCAP, were distributed to the emergency department providers at the OSU ED. Questions included responders' role in the ED, prior experience with treating pain crisis, time to make treatment management decisions for VOC, satisfaction with treatment decision, and the providers view of their relationship with patients. Wilcoxon signed-rank test and Fisher's exact test were applied to evaluate the differences between pre and post survey numeric and categorical responses.
Results
Surveys were sent electronically to 170 ED providers. Sixty-nine responses, making up 40.5% of those surveyed, were obtained from 30 attending physicians, 2 fellows, 22 nurse practitioners or physician assistants, 1 registered nurse, and 14 residents. Of those who answered the survey, 14 had experience with treating pain crisis prior to the implementation of individualized pain plans. Implementation of individualized pain plans led to a reduction in median time to make treatment decisions from 5.5 to 2.5 minutes with a p-value of 0.0161. Provider satisfaction with treatment decisions improved as well (p = 0.0029) (Figure 2). In addition, ED providers felt more satisfied with their relationship with patients (p = 0.0078) (Figure 3). The majority of responders (91.2%) also rated their satisfaction with the treatment decision as either satisfied or very satisfied (Figure 1). Seventy eight percent of those answering the survey rated with relationship with patients as being good or very good (Figure 1). In terms of the ease of finding the pain plan in the electronic medical record, 91.3% of providers found them to be either very easy or easy to locate with 94.12% responding that implementing the plan was either easy or very easy (Figure 4). Regarding efficacy of the pain plans, 89.85% found the pain plans to be either effective or very effective (Figure 5). Finally, of the 36 providers who worked elsewhere, about half of the institutions from which they came did not have pain plans.
Discussion
The results of this study show the importance of utilizing individualized pain plans in the treatment of VOC in the ED. As shown in our prior studies, the implementation of individualized pain plans for patients with SCD resulted in a 48% decrease in time to first opioid in the ED, thereby signifying more prompt treatment (Della-Moretta et al). Not only does the data support an improvement in time to make treatment decisions, which benefit the patients, but providers also appear to view their use as an advantage. Pain plan utilization also leads to an increase in provider confidence in their treatment plans as well as a perceived improvement in patient-provider relationships. This is particularly significant as historically the relationship between emergency room staff and sickle cell patients has been seen as challenging by both patients as well emergency room providers (Haywood et al). Making patient centered individualized pain plans readily available, easily accessible, and simple to enact, can further enhance the relationship between the patient, emergency room, and the hematology team. Ongoing communication and education between all parties is beneficial. With the combination of patient and provider data, we show that a win for the patient can also be a win for the provider.
Figure 1 Figure 1.
Disclosures
Desai: Pfizer: Other: Publication Fee, Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Global Blood Therapeutics: Honoraria, Research Funding; Foundation for Sickle Cell Research: Honoraria; Forma: Consultancy.
Healthcare utilization and satisfaction with treatment before and after direct discharge from the Emergency Department of simple stable musculoskeletal injuries in the Netherlands