scholarly journals Comparison of complications in the conventional telescopic Herbst rod and tube and Manni telescopic Herbst: A retrospective clinical study

2018 ◽  
Vol 88 (4) ◽  
pp. 377-383 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antonio Manni ◽  
Sabrina Mutinelli ◽  
Carmen Cerruto ◽  
Paola Giraudo ◽  
Rachele Romano ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Study ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
Lower Percentage ◽  
Herbst Appliance ◽  
Clinical Complications ◽  
Skeletal Malocclusion ◽  
Telescopic System ◽  
Retrospective Clinical Study

ABSTRACT Objectives: To compare the prevalence of clinical complications between two different telescopic Herbst systems: the conventional telescopic system, with traditional rod and tube (RMS), and the Manni telescopic Herbst appliance (MTH). Materials and Methods: Ninety subjects treated with RMS were compared to 89 patients treated with MTH. All of the complications that occurred were reported, and percentages of prevalence were calculated. Results: MTH showed a significantly lower percentage of reversible complications (that did not require appliance removal) when compared to the reversible complications during RMS treatment (20.2% vs 51.1%). No statistically significant differences were found between RMS and MTH regarding irreversible complications (that required appliance removal and full re-make). All of the irreversible complications occurred after reversible complications in the RMS group, while most of the irreversible complications in the MTH group occurred without any previous reversible complication. Conclusions: MTH exhibited a smaller number of clinical complications during Class II skeletal malocclusion therapy.

scholarly journals Comparison of Complications in Removable Mandibular Acrylic Splint and Cantilever Herbst for Management of Class II Malocclusion: A Retrospective Study

2017 ◽  
Vol 18 (5) ◽  
pp. 363-365 ◽  
Author(s):  
RK Kanuru ◽  
Vinny Bhasin ◽  
KK Dodda ◽  
Era Singh ◽  
Shekhar Grover
Keyword(s):  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
Class Ii Malocclusion ◽  
Type I ◽  
Herbst Appliance ◽  
Clinical Complications ◽  
Group I ◽  
Telescopic System ◽  
Division 1 ◽  
Clinical Records

ABSTRACT Introduction Numerous appliances are present for the management of class II malocclusion. We have conducted a study to compare the clinical complications during treatment with either a removable mandibular acrylic splint (RMS) or with a cantilever Herbst (HC) appliance for the management of class II malocclusion. Materials and methods This study consisted of records of 114 patients (61 males, 53 females), who were divided into two groups. Group I received RMS and group II received HC for the treatment of class II, Division 1 malocclusion. They were further subdivided according to the telescopic system used [Dentaurum type I or propulsor mandibular abzil (PMA)] and fixation mode (splint with crowns or GripTite bands). Patients’ clinical records were assessed to identify clinical complications. Results The results of the study showed that the incidence of complications during treatment in both groups was statistically nonsignificant. The complications with either crown or band were also statistically nonsignificant. The Dentaurum group showed more susceptibility to complications than the PMA group. Conclusion The PMA telescopic system is more efficient as compared with Dentaurum. Complication resulting from Herbst appliance is independent type of appliance used and mode of fixation. Clinical significance Herbst appliance is the treatment of choice for class II malocclusion. How to cite this article Kanuru RK, Bhasin V, Khatri A, Dodda KK, Singh E, Grover S. Comparison of Complications in Removable Mandibular Acrylic Splint and Cantilever Herbst for Management of Class II Malocclusion: A Retrospective Study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2017;18(5):363-365.

Class II Skeletal Malocclusion Correction with Herbst Appliance

2021 ◽  
pp. 18-28
Author(s):  
A. Arif Yezdani ◽  
Prashanth Sreenivasan ◽  
R. Padmavati ◽  
S. Kishore Kumar ◽  
Kesavaram Padmavathy
Keyword(s):  
Class Ii ◽  
Herbst Appliance ◽  
Skeletal Malocclusion

Comparison of AdvanSync and intermaxillary elastics in the correction of Class II malocclusions: A retrospective clinical study

2016 ◽  
Vol 150 (6) ◽  
pp. 979-988 ◽  
Author(s):  
Santhosh Jayachandran ◽  
William A. Wiltshire ◽  
Sandra M. Hayasaki ◽  
Fabio H.S.L. Pinheiro
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Study ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
Retrospective Clinical Study

scholarly journals Treatment effects of skeletally anchored Forsus FRD EZ and Herbst appliances: A retrospective clinical study

2015 ◽  
Vol 86 (2) ◽  
pp. 306-314 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mevlut Celikoglu ◽  
Suleyman Kutalmis Buyuk ◽  
Abdullah Ekizer ◽  
Tuba Unal
Keyword(s):  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
Class Ii Malocclusion ◽  
Herbst Appliance ◽  
Mandibular Incisor ◽  
Skeletal Class ◽  
Tissue Effects ◽  
Skeletal Class Ii ◽  
Group I ◽  
Retrospective Clinical Study

ABSTRACT Objective:  To evaluate the skeletal, dentoalveolar, and soft tissue effects of the Forsus FRD appliance with miniplate anchorage inserted in the mandibular symphyses and to compare the findings with a well-matched control group treated with a Herbst appliance for the correction of a skeletal Class II malocclusion due to mandibular retrusion. Materials and Methods:  The sample consisted of 32 Class II subjects divided into two groups. Group I consisted of 16 patients (10 females and 6 males; mean age, 13.20 ± 1.33 years) treated using the Forsus FRD EZ appliance with miniplate anchorage inserted in the mandibular symphyses. Group II consisted of 16 patients (9 females and 7 males; mean age, 13.56 ± 1.27 years) treated using the Herbst appliance. Seventeen linear and 10 angular measurements were performed to evaluate and compare the skeletal, dentoalveolar, and soft tissue effects of the appliances using paired and Student's t-tests. Results:  Both appliances were effective in correcting skeletal class II malocclusion and showed similar skeletal and soft tissue changes. The maxillary incisor was statistically significantly more retruded in the skeletally anchored Forsus FRD group (P < .01). The mandibular incisor was retruded in the skeletally anchored Forsus FRD group (−4.09° ± 5.12°), while it was protruded in the Herbst group (7.50° ± 3.98°) (P < .001). Conclusion:  Although both appliances were successful in correcting the skeletal Class II malocclusion, the skeletally anchored Forsus FRD EZ appliance did so without protruding the mandibular incisors.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document