How to manage a partial detachment of the ureter during robotic radical prostatectomy?

2021 ◽  
Vol 73 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Fabrizio DAL MORO ◽  
Federico GOFFO ◽  
Giordana FERRAIOLI ◽  
Carlotta ZABORRA ◽  
Claudio VALOTTO
Keyword(s):  
Radical Prostatectomy ◽  
Robotic Radical Prostatectomy

554: Prospective Comparison of Short-Term Recovery between Open and Robotic Radical Prostatectomy

2007 ◽  
Vol 177 (4S) ◽  
pp. 184-185
Author(s):  
Ryan T. Schulte ◽  
Rodney L. Dunn ◽  
Brent K. Hollenbeck ◽  
J. Stuart Wolf ◽  
James E. Montie ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Radical Prostatectomy ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Robotic Radical Prostatectomy ◽  
Prospective Comparison

1590: Histopathologic Outcomes of Robotic Radical Prostatectomy: An Analysis of Positive Margin Status in 1238 Consecutive Cases

2007 ◽  
Vol 177 (4S) ◽  
pp. 526-526
Author(s):  
David C. Arend ◽  
Ketul K. Shah ◽  
Rahul K. Thaly ◽  
Jill Woolard ◽  
Vipul R. Patel
Keyword(s):  
Radical Prostatectomy ◽  
Positive Margin ◽  
Margin Status ◽  
Robotic Radical Prostatectomy

scholarly journals Assessment of PSIM (Prostatic Systemic Inflammatory Markers) Score in Predicting Pathologic Features at Robotic Radical Prostatectomy in Patients with Low-Risk Prostate Cancer Who Met the Inclusion Criteria for Active Surveillance

Diagnostics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 355
Author(s):  
Matteo Ferro ◽  
Gennaro Musi ◽  
Deliu Victor Matei ◽  
Alessandro Francesco Mistretta ◽  
Stefano Luzzago ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Radical Prostatectomy ◽  
Active Surveillance ◽  
Inflammatory Markers ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
Inclusion Criteria ◽  
Robotic Radical Prostatectomy ◽  
Lymphocyte Ratio ◽  
Risk Prostate Cancer ◽  
Low Risk Prostate Cancer

Background: circulating levels of lymphocytes, platelets and neutrophils have been identified as factors related to unfavorable clinical outcome for many solid tumors. The aim of this cohort study is to evaluate and validate the use of the Prostatic Systemic Inflammatory Markers (PSIM) score in predicting and improving the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) in men undergoing robotic radical prostatectomy for low-risk prostate cancer who met the inclusion criteria for active surveillance. Methods: we reviewed the medical records of 260 patients who fulfilled the inclusion criteria for active surveillance. We performed a head-to-head comparison between the histological findings of specimens after radical prostatectomy (RP) and prostate biopsies. The PSIM score was calculated on the basis of positivity according to cutoffs (neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) 2.0, platelets-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) 118 and monocyte-to-lymphocyte-ratio (MLR) 5.0), with 1 point assigned for each value exceeding the specified threshold and then summed, yielding a final score ranging from 0 to 3. Results: median NLR was 2.07, median PLR was 114.83, median MLR was 3.69. Conclusion: we found a significantly increase in the rate of pathological International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) ≥ 2 with the increase of PSIM. At the multivariate logistic regression analysis adjusted for age, prostate specific antigen (PSA), PSA density, prostate volume and PSIM, the latter was found the sole independent prognostic variable influencing probability of adverse pathology.

POTENCY FOLLOWING ROBOTIC RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY: A QUESTIONNAIRE BASED ANALYSIS OF OUTCOMES AFTER CONVENTIONAL NERVE SPARING AND PROSTATIC FASCIA SPARING TECHNIQUES

2005 ◽  
Vol 174 (6) ◽  
pp. 2291-2296 ◽  
Author(s):  
MANI MENON ◽  
SANJEEV KAUL ◽  
AKSHAY BHANDARI ◽  
ALOK SHRIVASTAVA ◽  
ASHUTOSH TEWARI ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Radical Prostatectomy ◽  
Nerve Sparing ◽  
Robotic Radical Prostatectomy
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document