Combining Devs and Semantic Technologies for Modeling the SARS-CoV-2 Replication Machinery

Author(s):  
Ali Ayadi ◽  
Claudia Frydman ◽  
Wissame Laddada ◽  
Lina F. Soualmia ◽  
Cecilia Zanni-Merk ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
Iklódi Eszter ◽  
Gábor Recski ◽  
Gábor Borbély ◽  
Maria Jose Castro-Bleda

2021 ◽  
Vol 19 ◽  
pp. 2057-2069
Author(s):  
Rebeca Bocanegra ◽  
G.A. Ismael Plaza ◽  
Carlos R. Pulido ◽  
Borja Ibarra

Genetics ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 166 (4) ◽  
pp. 1631-1640 ◽  
Author(s):  
Janet R Donaldson ◽  
Charmain T Courcelle ◽  
Justin Courcelle

Abstract Ultraviolet light induces DNA lesions that block the progression of the replication machinery. Several models speculate that the resumption of replication following disruption by UV-induced DNA damage requires regression of the nascent DNA or migration of the replication machinery away from the blocking lesion to allow repair or bypass of the lesion to occur. Both RuvAB and RecG catalyze branch migration of three- and four-stranded DNA junctions in vitro and are proposed to catalyze fork regression in vivo. To examine this possibility, we characterized the recovery of DNA synthesis in ruvAB and recG mutants. We found that in the absence of either RecG or RuvAB, arrested replication forks are maintained and DNA synthesis is resumed with kinetics that are similar to those in wild-type cells. The data presented here indicate that RecG- or RuvAB-catalyzed fork regression is not essential for DNA synthesis to resume following arrest by UV-induced DNA damage in vivo.


2019 ◽  
Vol 59 ◽  
pp. 100500
Author(s):  
Mariano Rico ◽  
Daniel Vila-Suero ◽  
Iuliana Botezan ◽  
Asunción Gómez-Pérez

BMC Biology ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Eugene V. Koonin ◽  
Mart Krupovic ◽  
Sonoko Ishino ◽  
Yoshizumi Ishino

2010 ◽  
Vol 43 (4) ◽  
pp. 54-59 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mathias Muehlhause ◽  
Nico Suchold ◽  
Christian Diedrich

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document