The Loss-Averse Newsvendor Problem with Random Supply Capacity and Reference Point

Author(s):  
Wei Liu ◽  
Han Zhao ◽  
Shiji Song ◽  
Huachang Wang
2021 ◽  
Vol 0 (0) ◽  
pp. 0
Author(s):  
Wei Liu ◽  
Shiji Song ◽  
Ying Qiao ◽  
Han Zhao ◽  
Huachang Wang

Mathematics ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (8) ◽  
pp. 1231
Author(s):  
Wei Liu ◽  
Shiji Song ◽  
Ying Qiao ◽  
Han Zhao ◽  
Huachang Wang

This paper studies a loss-averse newsvendor problem with reference dependence, where both demand and yield rate are stochastic. We obtain the loss-averse newsvendor’s optimal ordering policy and analyze the effects of loss aversion, reference dependence, random demand and yield on it. It is shown that the loss-averse newsvendor’s optimal order quantity and expected utility decreases in loss aversion level and reference point. Then, that this order quantity may be larger than the risk-neutral one’s if the reference point is less than a negative threshold. In addition, although the effect of random yield leads to an increase in the order quantity, the loss-averse newsvendor may order more than, equal to or less than the classical one, which significantly depends on loss aversion level and reference point. Numerical experiments were conducted to demonstrate our theoretical results.


2017 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 1417-1429 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wei Liu ◽  
◽  
Shiji Song ◽  
Ying Qiao ◽  
Han Zhao ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 39 (2) ◽  
pp. 99-106 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michał Białek ◽  
Przemysław Sawicki

Abstract. In this work, we investigated individual differences in cognitive reflection effects on delay discounting – a preference for smaller sooner over larger later payoff. People are claimed to prefer more these alternatives they considered first – so-called reference point – over the alternatives they considered later. Cognitive reflection affects the way individuals process information, with less reflective individuals relying predominantly on the first information they consider, thus, being more susceptible to reference points as compared to more reflective individuals. In Experiment 1, we confirmed that individuals who scored high on the Cognitive Reflection Test discount less strongly than less reflective individuals, but we also show that such individuals are less susceptible to imposed reference points. Experiment 2 replicated these findings additionally providing evidence that cognitive reflection predicts discounting strength and (in)dependency to reference points over and above individual difference in numeracy.


Author(s):  
Amber N. Bloomfield ◽  
Jessica M. Choplin
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document