scholarly journals Outcomes for Successfully Repaired Macula-Off Diabetic Tractional Retinal Detachment

Author(s):  
Quiroz-Reyes Miguel A ◽  
Quiroz-Gonzalez Erick A ◽  
Esparza-Correa Felipe ◽  
Kim-Lee Jennifer H ◽  
Morales-Navarro Jorge ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. e240506
Author(s):  
Albert John Bromeo ◽  
Amadeo Veloso ◽  
Sweet Jorlene Lerit ◽  
Myron Carlo Gomez

Tractional retinal detachment is an uncommon complication of intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) injection wherein the drug triggers tractional retinal detachment as a result of fibrovascular membrane contraction. We present a case of a 42-year-old hypertensive woman diagnosed with chronic central retinal vein occlusion on both eyes. The right eye had total retinal detachment and neovascular glaucoma, while the left eye had retinal neovascularisation. Panretinal photocoagulation and intravitreal anti-VEGF injection was started on the left eye. However, she was lost to follow-up. She returned 4 months later with extensive tractional retinal detachment involving the macula on the left eye. She subsequently underwent vitrectomy with endolaser and silicone oil tamponade on the left eye. The anti-VEGF ‘crunch’ results from regression of fibrovascular proliferation with a concurrent increase in fibrosis, resulting in worsening retinal traction. With the widespread use of anti-VEGF agents, ophthalmologists need to be aware of this vision-threatening complication.


1997 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 171-173 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Marullo ◽  
A. Scupola ◽  
R. Pasqua ◽  
N. Agostini ◽  
E. Balestrazzi

2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Byung Ju Jung ◽  
Sohee Jeon ◽  
Kook Lee ◽  
Jiwon Baek ◽  
Won Ki Lee

This study is for reporting the outcomes of internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling on persistent submacular fluid (PSF) after otherwise successful pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) for diabetic tractional retinal detachment (TRD). In this retrospective case series, five consecutive patients (5 eyes) who exhibited PSF following successful repair of diabetic TRD were included. The second operation was performed to remove ILM. The area of ILM peeling was expanded up to the major vascular arcade. Only air tamponade was used. The median interval between the first PPV and the second PPV with ILM peeling was 4.8 months (range: 4–6 months). PSF resolved completely within one (2 eyes) or 2 months after ILM peeling. The median logMAR best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was improved from 1.00 (Snellen equivalent 20/200) to 0.70 (Snellen equivalent 20/100). In conclusion, wide ILM peeling is an effective treatment option for PSF subsequent to successful repair of diabetic TRD. ILM peeling might increase the elasticity of retina, thereby allowing the retina to flatten. This procedure can induce faster retinal reattachment in diabetic TRD involving the macula.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document