scholarly journals Introduction to the Minitrack on Open Science Practices in Information Systems Research

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cathal Doyle ◽  
Markus Luczak-Roesch ◽  
Yi-Te Chiu ◽  
Tadhg Nagle
Keyword(s):  
Information Systems ◽  
Open Science ◽  
Science Practices ◽  
Systems Research ◽  
Information Systems Research

scholarly journals Introduction to the Minitrack on Open Science Practices in Information Systems Research

2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cathal Doyle ◽  
Markus Luczak-Roesch ◽  
Tadhg Nagle ◽  
Yi-Te Chiu
Keyword(s):  
Information Systems ◽  
Open Science ◽  
Science Practices ◽  
Systems Research ◽  
Information Systems Research

scholarly journals We Need the Open Artefact: Design Science as a Pathway to Open Science in Information Systems Research

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cathal Doyle ◽  
Markus Luczak-Roesch ◽  
A Mittal
Keyword(s):  
Process Model ◽  
Design Science ◽  
Open Data ◽  
Science Research ◽  
Past Research ◽  
Open Science ◽  
Science Practices ◽  
Systems Research ◽  
Information Systems Research ◽  
Competitive Funding

© 2019, Springer Nature Switzerland AG. Design science research (DSR) is facing some significant challenges such as how to make the knowledge and artefacts we create more accessible; exclusion from competitive funding schemes that require open practices; and a potential reproducibility crisis if scholars do not have access to everything needed to repeat past research. To help tackle these challenges we suggest that the community should strongly engage with open science, which has been growing in prominence in other fields in recent years. A review of current DSR literature suggests that researchers have not yet discussed how open science practices can be adopted within the field. Thus, we propose how the concepts of open science, namely open access, open data, open source, and open peer review, can be mapped to a DSR process model. Further, we identify an emerging concept, the open artefact, which provides an opportunity to make artefacts more accessible to practice and scholars. The aim of this paper is to stimulate a discussion amongst researchers about these open science practices in DSR, and whether it is a necessary step forward to keep the pace of the changing academic environment.

scholarly journals We need the open artefact: Design Science as a pathway to Open Science in Information Systems research

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cathal Doyle ◽  
Markus Luczak-Roesch ◽  
Abhinav Mittal
Keyword(s):  
Process Model ◽  
Design Science ◽  
Open Data ◽  
Science Research ◽  
Past Research ◽  
Open Science ◽  
Science Practices ◽  
Systems Research ◽  
Information Systems Research ◽  
Competitive Funding

Design science research is facing some significant challenges such as how to make the knowledge and artefacts we create more accessible; exclusion from competitive funding schemes that require open practices; and a potential reproducibility crisis if scholars do not have access to everything needed to repeat past research. To help tackle these challenges we suggest that the community should strongly engage with open science, which has been growing in prominence in other fields in recent years. A review of current DSR literature suggests that re-searchers have not yet discussed how open science practices can be adopted with-in the field. Thus, we propose how the concepts of open science, namely open access, open data, open source, and open peer review, can be mapped to a DSR process model. Further, we identify an emerging concept, the open artefact, which provides an opportunity to make artefacts more accessible to practice and scholars. The aim of this paper is to stimulate a discussion amongst researchers about these open science practices in DSR, and whether it is a necessary step forward to keep the pace of the changing academic environment. ....................................................................................................................................................................This paper is a preprint of a paper accepted at DESRIST 2019 (https://desrist2019.org/).

scholarly journals We Need the Open Artefact: Design Science as a Pathway to Open Science in Information Systems Research

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cathal Doyle ◽  
Markus Luczak-Roesch ◽  
A Mittal
Keyword(s):  
Process Model ◽  
Design Science ◽  
Open Data ◽  
Science Research ◽  
Past Research ◽  
Open Science ◽  
Science Practices ◽  
Systems Research ◽  
Information Systems Research ◽  
Competitive Funding

© 2019, Springer Nature Switzerland AG. Design science research (DSR) is facing some significant challenges such as how to make the knowledge and artefacts we create more accessible; exclusion from competitive funding schemes that require open practices; and a potential reproducibility crisis if scholars do not have access to everything needed to repeat past research. To help tackle these challenges we suggest that the community should strongly engage with open science, which has been growing in prominence in other fields in recent years. A review of current DSR literature suggests that researchers have not yet discussed how open science practices can be adopted within the field. Thus, we propose how the concepts of open science, namely open access, open data, open source, and open peer review, can be mapped to a DSR process model. Further, we identify an emerging concept, the open artefact, which provides an opportunity to make artefacts more accessible to practice and scholars. The aim of this paper is to stimulate a discussion amongst researchers about these open science practices in DSR, and whether it is a necessary step forward to keep the pace of the changing academic environment.

A Bridge Too Far?

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charlotte P. Lee ◽  
Kjeld Schmidt
Keyword(s):  
Information Systems ◽  
Science And Technology Studies ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Cooperative Work ◽  
Computer Supported Cooperative Work ◽  
Practical Action ◽  
Systems Research ◽  
Information Infrastructures ◽  
Information Systems Research ◽  
Critical Investigation

The study of computing infrastructures has grown significantly due to the rapid proliferation and ubiquity of large-scale IT-based installations. At the same time, recognition has also grown of the usefulness of such studies as a means for understanding computing infrastructures as material complements of practical action. Subsequently the concept of “infrastructure” (or “information infrastructures,” “cyberinfrastructures,” and “infrastructuring”) has gained increasing importance in the area of Computer-Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) as well as in neighboring areas such as Information Systems research (IS) and Science and Technology Studies (STS). However, as such studies have unfolded, the very concept of “infrastructure” is being applied in different discourses, for different purposes, in myriad different senses. Consequently, the concept of “infrastructure” has become increasingly muddled and needs clarification. The chapter presents a critical investigation of the vicissitudes of the concept of “infrastructure” over the last 35 years.

scholarly journals Expl(AI)n It to Me – Explainable AI and Information Systems Research

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin Bauer ◽  
Oliver Hinz ◽  
Wil van der Aalst ◽  
Christof Weinhardt
Keyword(s):  
Information Systems ◽  
Systems Research ◽  
Information Systems Research ◽  
Explainable Ai
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document