AGE AND INTERSTIMULUS INTERVAL IN FORWARD AND BACKWARD LONG-TRACE TASTE-AVERSION CONDITIONING

2007 ◽  
Vol 105 (7) ◽  
pp. 1223
Author(s):  
ELI MINNIER
2007 ◽  
Vol 105 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1223-1226 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eli Minnier ◽  
James R. Misanin ◽  
Charles F. Hinderliter

1995 ◽  
Vol 76 (2) ◽  
pp. 636-638 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles F. Hinderliter ◽  
James R. Misanin

Young-adult and old-adult rats were allowed to remain in the conditioning context or were returned to their home cages during a 3-hr. interval to assess whether previously observed age differences in long-delay taste-aversion conditioning may be due to age differences in the use of home-cage cues to mediate the CS-US association over a long delay. The old adults but not the young adults showed an aversion irrespective of the context in which they were detained during the interstimulus interval. These results suggest that young-adult rats do not use the interstimulus context cues to mediate the association over a delay interval. They suggest, rather, that context cues, which are more contiguous with the US than taste cues in long-delay conditioning, may be more effective in overshadowing taste cues in young adults than in old adults.


2004 ◽  
Vol 65 (2) ◽  
pp. 111-121 ◽  
Author(s):  
James R Misanin ◽  
John P Christianson ◽  
Matthew J Anderson ◽  
Lauren M Giovanni ◽  
Charles F Hinderliter

1988 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
pp. 258-260 ◽  
Author(s):  
James R. Misanin ◽  
Douglas L. Greider ◽  
Charles F. Hinderliter

1980 ◽  
Vol 25 (6) ◽  
pp. 989-992 ◽  
Author(s):  
W.F. Buskist ◽  
H.L. Miller ◽  
P. Duncan ◽  
D.E. Fleming

1976 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 254-264 ◽  
Author(s):  
Phillip J Best ◽  
Michael R Best ◽  
Gaye P Lindsey

Peptides ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 483-488 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jack T. Mosher ◽  
Michael F. Johnson ◽  
Lawrence S. Birkemo ◽  
Gregory N. Ervin

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document