CONDITIONING THE REACTION TIME RESPONSE

1990 ◽  
Vol 71 (6) ◽  
pp. 509
Author(s):  
ALBERTO MONTARE
Brain ◽  
1983 ◽  
Vol 106 (4) ◽  
pp. 929-947 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. BART VRTUNSKI ◽  
MARIAN B. PATTERSON ◽  
JAMES L. MACK ◽  
GREGORY O. HILL

2016 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 201-209 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jader Sant’Ana ◽  
Emerson Franchini ◽  
Vinicius da Silva ◽  
Fernando Diefenthaeler

2011 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 171-178 ◽  
Author(s):  
Akiko Higashiyama ◽  
Hla Hla Htay ◽  
Makoto Ozeki ◽  
Lekh R. Juneja ◽  
Mahendra P. Kapoor

1974 ◽  
Vol 38 (2) ◽  
pp. 379-382 ◽  
Author(s):  
Perry M. Nealis

It appears that a component of verbal reaction time, response-choice latency, exists for encoded words as well as colors. Therefore, it was hypothesized that color stimuli could exert a disruptive influence on the processes of this latency to encoded word stimuli in contrast to the reverse effect which has often been found in the standard Stroop test. Stroop-like interference in word reading was produced by preexposure of color names printed in colored ink, followed by the presentation of a second stimulus which reinforced the color information of the first stimulus. The experimental results do not appear to be an artifact of mere distraction of attention.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document