Differential Eyelid Conditioning as a Function of CS-UCS Interval and Distance Separating the CSS

1969 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 407-411
Author(s):  
W. E. Vandament

Human Ss were given differential eyelid conditioning at CS-UCS intervals of 400, 600, and 800 msec. to visual CSs separated by 1.25 and 2.50 in. The CS outlines were not visible to S during the intertrial interval as they customarily are in spatial discrimination tasks. CS+ response levels increased with interval throughout the range employed with CS− levels increasing only through 600 msec. No differentiation was observed at 400 and 600 msec. intervals at either level of separation. These results indicate that CS-UCS interval functions in differential conditioning cannot be generally defined and must be related to the conditions employed in a given experiment.

1967 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 137-138 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter W. Frey ◽  
Thomas J. Misfeldt

1967 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 435-445 ◽  
Author(s):  
John W. Davenport ◽  
William W. Hagquist

4 stumptail monkeys and 4 albino rats were trained in a discrete-trials latency-correlated reinforcement (DRL) situation. Phenomena investigated were: (a) acquisition of temporal discriminations, (b) effects of within- S intertrial interval variations, (c) disinhibition of responses by novel extraneous stimuli, (d) effects of reinforcement magnitude, and (e) differential conditioning based upon reinforcement of short vs long latencies. Detailed quantitative descriptions of these phenomena were obtained by automated procedures permitting direct species comparisons.


1964 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 31-37 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. Robert Brush ◽  
James S. Myer ◽  
Michael E. Palmer

The effect of intertrial and intersession interval on the relearning of an incompletely learned avoidance response was studied in a factorial experiment having three intertrial intervals—½, 1, and 2 min.—and five intersession intervals—.08, 1, 4, 24, and 168 hr. Original learning was avoidance training to a criterion, and relearning was 40 trials of the same training. Five groups of 10 rats, matched for rate of original learning, were trained at each intertrial interval. The number of avoidance responses during relearning was a U-shaped function of intersession interval for all intertrial intervals. During the first 10 relearning trials, the maximum interfering effect occurred after an intersession interval of 24 hr. in the ½-min. groups and after 4 hr. in the 1- and 2-min. groups. During the rest of relearning, maximum interference was reached after 1 hr., and the intersession interval functions were independent of intertrial interval, except for over-all level. These results were interpreted in terms of a “parasympathetic over-reaction” following fear conditioning.


1967 ◽  
Vol 9 (6) ◽  
pp. 333-334 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leonard E. Ross ◽  
Susan M. Wilcox ◽  
Melanie J. Mayer

1970 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
pp. 141-143 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul A. Fox ◽  
Richard S. Calef ◽  
James R. GaveLek ◽  
James H. McHose

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document