scholarly journals Characterization of Creep Crack Growth Rate at the Early Stage and Estimation of Creep Crack Initiation Life for High Cr Steels and Their Weldments

2013 ◽  
Vol 62 (2) ◽  
pp. 68-74
Author(s):  
Ryuji SUGIURA ◽  
A. Toshimitsu YOKOBORI, Jr. ◽  
Kazuto SATO ◽  
Masaaki TABUCHI ◽  
Kenichi KOBAYASHI ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 353-358 ◽  
pp. 106-109
Author(s):  
C.S. Jeong ◽  
Byeung Gun Nam ◽  
Katsuhiko Watanabe

Creep crack growth (CCG) rate has been organized frequently by C* or Ct parameter However, crack behavior of early stage under unsteady state condition has not been explained. Crack energy density (CED), which has been proposed as a parameter that can provide a unified description of crack behavior with no restriction on constitutive equation, can give the general expression about creep crack growth rate. By applying Ct and the concept of CED to the results, we showed that creep crack growth rate for all ranges of creep can be explained in a unified way by CED and its derivatives. Moreover, the physical meaning of the Ct is clarified in the discussion.



2003 ◽  
Vol 80 (7-8) ◽  
pp. 435-440 ◽  
Author(s):  
Akio Fuji ◽  
A. Toshimitsu Yokobori ◽  
Mizuki Kikuchi ◽  
Masaaki Tabuchi ◽  
Takeo Yokobori


2001 ◽  
Vol 78 (11-12) ◽  
pp. 757-764 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Toshimitsu Yokobori ◽  
Tsuyoshi Satoh ◽  
Masayuki Shibata ◽  
Masaaki Tabuchi ◽  
Akio Fuji ◽  
...  


2016 ◽  
Vol 30 (7) ◽  
pp. 3151-3158 ◽  
Author(s):  
I. M. W. Ekaputra ◽  
Woo-Gon Kim ◽  
Jae-Young Park ◽  
Seon-Jin Kim ◽  
Eung-Seon Kim




2015 ◽  
Vol 130 ◽  
pp. 1677-1685
Author(s):  
H.S. Ma ◽  
G.Z. Wang ◽  
F.Z. Xuan ◽  
S.-T. Tu


2005 ◽  
Vol 475-479 ◽  
pp. 1433-1436 ◽  
Author(s):  
Woo Gon Kim ◽  
Hyun Hie Kim ◽  
Kee Bong Yoon ◽  
Woo Seog Ryu

This paper is to evaluate the creep crack growth rate (CCGR) of the type 316SS series: 316SS, 316FR and 316LN, and to apply a creep ductility model. A number of the data are collected through wide literature surveys and experiment, and evaluated by the C* parameter. The results of the CCGR data were nearly matched with a small scattering band regardless of the different applied stresses, temperatures and test specimens configuration. In the CCGR, type 316FR and 316LN steels were slower than type 316SS. Type 316SS showed a better agreement in the application of the creep ductility model than the type 316FR and 316LN steels.





Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document