Educative Communication Techniques Between Parents and Children in the Koran

The focus of this research is to examine the communication techniques between parents and children in the context of parenting and giving advice (sharenting) for the prevention of children or adolescents' delinquency. The informants of this research were students, teachers, parents, and community leaders from two countries (Indonesia and Malaysia). Data were collected utilizing the focus group discussion techniques via Zoom meeting platform. Data were analyzed using interactive analysis which includes four stages, namely: data collection, data reduction, display data, and drawing a conclusion/verification. The results show that parenting and sharenting communication are strategic forums to guide adolescents to avoid various forms of deviant behavior, especially delinquency. The communication techniques applied consist of persuasive and in certain conditions coercive communication techniques are utilized. Communication barriers include the lack of commitment of some parents in carrying out comprehensive communication.

Download Full-text

Speech-Language Pathologists' Comfort Level With Use of Term “Stuttering” During Evaluations

American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology ◽

10.1044/2020_ajslp-19-00081 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 29 (2) ◽

pp. 841-850 ◽

Cited By ~ 3

Author(s):

Courtney T. Byrd ◽

Danielle Werle ◽

Kenneth O. St. Louis

Keyword(s):

Communication Disorders ◽

Academic Experiences ◽

Comfort Level ◽

Future Research ◽

Clinical Experiences ◽

Speech Language Pathologists ◽

Comfort Levels ◽

Parents And Children ◽

Evaluation Feedback ◽

Study Participants

Purpose Speech-language pathologists (SLPs) anecdotally report concern that their interactions with a child who stutters, including even the use of the term “stuttering,” might contribute to negative affective, behavioral, and cognitive consequences. This study investigated SLPs' comfort in providing a diagnosis of “stuttering” to children's parents/caregivers, as compared to other commonly diagnosed developmental communication disorders. Method One hundred forty-one school-based SLPs participated in this study. Participants were randomly assigned to one of two vignettes detailing an evaluation feedback session. Then, participants rated their level of comfort disclosing diagnostic terms to parents/caregivers. Participants provided rationale for their ratings and answered various questions regarding academic and clinical experiences to identify factors that may have influenced ratings. Results SLPs were significantly less likely to feel comfortable using the term “stuttering” compared to other communication disorders. Thematic responses revealed increased experience with a specific speech-language population was related to higher comfort levels with using its diagnostic term. Additionally, knowing a person who stutters predicted greater comfort levels as compared to other clinical and academic experiences. Conclusions SLPs were significantly less comfortable relaying the diagnosis “stuttering” to families compared to other speech-language diagnoses. Given the potential deleterious effects of avoidance of this term for both parents and children who stutter, future research should explore whether increased exposure to persons who stutter of all ages systematically improves comfort level with the use of this term.

Download Full-text

Encouraging Connections Between Parents and Children With Autism

ASHA Leader ◽

10.1044/leader.ov.19062014.np ◽

2014 ◽

Vol 19 (6) ◽

Author(s):

Juliann J. Woods

Keyword(s):

Children With Autism ◽

Parents And Children

Download Full-text

Treatment for Progressive Impairments of Language

Perspectives on Neurophysiology and Neurogenic Speech and Language Disorders ◽

10.1044/nnsld20.1.13 ◽

2010 ◽

Vol 20 (1) ◽

pp. 13-20 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Maya Henry

Keyword(s):

Behavioral Treatment ◽

Primary Progressive Aphasia ◽

Sentence Production ◽

Lexical Retrieval ◽

Functional Communication ◽

Language Performance ◽

Communication Techniques ◽

Primary Object ◽

Behavioral Treatments ◽

Treatment Research

Abstract Primary progressive aphasia (PPA) is a relatively new diagnostic entity, for which few behavioral treatments have been investigated. Recent work has helped to clarify the nature of distinct PPA variants, including a nonfluent variant (NFV-PPA), a logopenic variant (LV-PPA), and a semantic variant (SV-PPA). This paper reviews treatment research to date in each subtype of PPA, including restitutive, augmentative, and functional approaches. The evidence suggests that restitutive behavioral treatment can result in improved or stabilized language performance within treated domains. Specifically, sentence production and lexical retrieval have been addressed in NFV-PPA, whereas lexical retrieval has been the primary object of treatment in LV and SV-PPA. Use of augmentative communication techniques, as well as implementation of functional communication approaches, also may result in improved communication skills in individuals with PPA. The ideal treatment approach may be one that combines restitutive, augmentative, and functional approaches to treatment, in order to maximize residual cognitive-linguistic skills in patients. Additional research is warranted to determine which modes of treatment are most beneficial in each type of PPA at various stages of severity.

Download Full-text