scholarly journals Does Trading Volume explain the Information Flow of Crude Palm Oil Futures Returns?

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 115-136
Author(s):  
You-How Go ◽  
◽  
Wee-Yeap Lau ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Palm Oil ◽  
Trading Volume ◽  
Futures Market ◽  
Sensitive Information ◽  
Crude Palm Oil ◽  
Futures Trading ◽  
Oil Futures ◽  
Futures Contract ◽  
Information Set

This study examines the role of trading volume in the crude palm oil (CPO)futures market as a proxy for information áow from the perspective of the mixture-of-distributions hypothesis (MDH). Using the data from January 2000 to April 2017, a sym-metric GARCH model has been estimated, in which the residuals follow alternatively thenormal Student-t and generalised error distribution. An alternative augmented model thatconsists of trading volume as an exogenous variable is estimated with the same error dis-tributions. Our results suggest several conclusions: First, the trading volume could not actas a true proxy for information áow. This indicates that volume of futures trading containsrelatively less price-sensitive information. Secondly, the inclusion of trading volume into theconditional variance equation with Student-t distributed errors is important for modellingpurposes when the returns are leptokurtic and positively skewed. Hence, it can be concludedthat the use of return and trading volume will enhance the current information set usedby practitioners and analysts in pricing the CPO futures contract when there exists a highdegree of leptokurtosis in the returns. This is the Örst study that validates the MDH in thecontext of the CPO futures market

EFFECTIVE CROSS HEDGING: EVIDENCE FROM PHYSICAL CRUDE PALM OIL AND ITS INTER-RELATED AGRICULTURAL FUTURES CONTRACTS

2018 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 123
Author(s):  
Noryati Ahmad ◽  
Ahmad Danial Zainudin ◽  
Fahmi Abdul Rahim ◽  
Catherine S F Ho
Keyword(s):  
Palm Oil ◽  
Futures Contracts ◽  
Crude Palm Oil ◽  
Oil Futures ◽  
Futures Contract ◽  
Agricultural Futures ◽  
Cross Hedging ◽  
Optimal Hedge ◽  
Excessive Speculation ◽  
Chicago Board Of Trade

Since its establishment, Crude Palm Oil futures contract (FCPO) has been used to directly hedge its physical crude palm oil (CPO). However, due to the excessive speculation activities on crude palm oil futures market, it has been said to be no longer an effective hedging tool to mitigate the price risk of its underlying physical market. This triggers the need for market players to find possible alternatives to ensure that the hedging role can be executed effectively. Thus this investigation attempts to examine whether other inter-related grains and oil seed futures contracts could serve as effective cross-hedging mechanisms for the CPO. Weekly data of inter-related futures contracts from Chicago Board of Trade (CBOT) and Dalian Commodity Exchange (DCE) are employed to cross hedge the physical crude palm oil prices. The study starts from 2006 until 2016. Empirical results indicate that FCPO is still the best futures contract for hedging purposes while Chicago Soybean (CBOTBO) provides second best alternative if cross-hedging is considered. Keywords: Crude palm oil, Crude palm oil futures, Cross Hedging, Optimal Hedge Ratio, Effective Hedging

Effective cross hedging: Evidence from physical crude palm oil and its non-interrelated energy futures contracts

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Ahmad Danial Zainudin ◽  
Noryati Ahmad ◽  
Fahmi Abdul Rahim
Keyword(s):  
New York ◽  
Palm Oil ◽  
Variance Reduction ◽  
Least Square ◽  
Futures Contracts ◽  
Crude Palm Oil ◽  
Oil Futures ◽  
Energy Futures ◽  
Futures Contract ◽  
Cross Hedging

Recent researchers found that Crude Palm Oil Futures contract (FCPO) in Bursa Malaysia Derivatives is no longer an effective hedging tool to mitigate the price risk in cash market due to the excessive speculation trading activities. This is very alarming to the hedgers hence possible hedge pair alternatives to crude palm oil physical must be identified to ensure that the hedging can be executed effectively. Therefore in this study, Ordinary Least Square, bivariate VAR and bivariate VECM were used to examine whether the non-interrelated energy futures contracts could serve as effective cross-hedging mechanisms for the CPO. Weekly data of agricultural and energy futures contracts from Intercontinental Exchange (ICE), New York Mercantile Exchange (NYMEX), and Tokyo Commodity Exchange (TOCOM) are employed to cross hedge the physical crude palm oil prices. The study starts from 2006 until 2016. Empirical results indicate that bivariate VECM gives more hedging variance reduction. Surprisingly, overall FCPO is still the best futures contract for hedging purposes while Japanese crude oil futures (TOCOM) represents the energy futures market as the best cross hedge alternatives for CPO.

scholarly journals Trading Activities and the Volatility of Return on Malaysian Crude Palm Oil Futures

2022 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 34
Author(s):  
Xiu Wei Yeap ◽  
Hooi Hooi Lean
Keyword(s):  
Palm Oil ◽  
Trading Volume ◽  
Positive Relationship ◽  
Information Flows ◽  
Crude Palm Oil ◽  
Open Interest ◽  
Oil Futures ◽  
Independent Variables ◽  
Trading Activities ◽  
The Garch Model

Trading activities represent the flow of market information to the investors. This paper examines the effect of trading activities, i.e., trading volume and open interest, on the volatility of return for Malaysian Crude Palm Oil Futures. The GARCH model is applied by adding the expected and unexpected elements of trading activities (trading volume and open interest) as the independent variables. The results show that there is a negative contemporaneous relationship between the expected volume and volatility, but that a positive relationship exists between unexpected volume and volatility. On the contrary, the expected and unexpected open interest mitigate the volatility. Therefore, both trading volume and open interest should be considered together when information flows into the market.

scholarly journals Open outcry versus electronic trading: Tests of market efficiency on crude palm oil futures

2018 ◽  
Vol 38 (6) ◽  
pp. 673-695 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stuart Snaith ◽  
Neil M. Kellard ◽  
Norzalina Ahmad
Keyword(s):  
Market Efficiency ◽  
Palm Oil ◽  
Electronic Trading ◽  
Crude Palm Oil ◽  
Oil Futures ◽  
Open Outcry
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document