The Impact of Innovation Activities on New Business Formation: the Moderating Effect of New Business Team

2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 62-82
Author(s):  
Eunjung Kim ◽  
Joon Mo Ahn
2021 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Amit Ghosh

Purpose Using an extensive data set of 137 nations spanning the period 2002–2014, this paper aims to examine the effect of banking sector openness on entrepreneurship, as measured by new business entry rate. Design/methodology/approach The paper uses a panel data estimation framework covering 137 nations during 2002–2014. This study uses fixed effects, two-stage instrumental variables, two-step systems-generalized method of moments and difference-in-difference estimation methodologies. Findings Greater banking sector openness significantly increases new business formations. This paper finds a one-unit increase in the share of non-residential bank loans leads to 1.25 new business start-ups in the average nation. Likewise, a unit increase in the ratio of external to domestic deposits raises new business formation by 1.31 new businesses. Furthermore, the positive impact of banking sector openness on entrepreneurial activities is strengthened in nations with deeper financial markets, ones with better business environments to start a business and those with higher economic growth and development. Practical implications These findings have key implications for policy measures on both institutional business entry reforms and banking sector openness and the interaction between the two. From a policy perspective, the results show greater banking sector openness can only maximize its benefits on entrepreneurship in the presence of an effective institutional framework and sound macroeconomic fundamentals in host nations. It is also imperative that policymakers simplify regulations for the entry of new businesses. Additionally, achieving higher economic growth rates and greater economic affluence should allow both current and potential business owners to respond better to changes in financing conditions like greater access to loans from foreign banks. Originality/value Entrepreneurship and new business formation are central to any economic and business activity in a nation. The entrance of new firms into an economy creates jobs, fosters research, diffusion of knowledge and innovation and contributes to economic growth. Liberalizing a nation’s banking industry may represent an invaluable source of capital for new entrepreneurs and foster the creation of new companies. However, there is scant literature that has empirically examined the impact of opening up a nation’s banking sector on new business formations.


2015 ◽  
Vol 20 (03) ◽  
pp. 1550015 ◽  
Author(s):  
HERNÁN HERRERA-ECHEVERRI ◽  
JERRY HAAR ◽  
ALEXANDER ARRIETA JIMÉNEZ ◽  
MANUEL ARAÚJO ZAPATA

In September 2010, Brazil’s Finance Minister, Guido Mantega, used the term “currency war” with reference to monetary policies implemented by different countries to generate an artificial devaluation of their currency and achieve a cheaper, more competitive domestic economy that may be attractive to foreign investors. Similar cases have been documented since the 1930’s Great Depression, when several countries abandoned the gold standard as backing for their currencies. More recently, a large-scale asset purchase by Japan’s Central Bank in 2013 was singled out as a strategy aimed at generating devaluation of the yen. This research uses statistics of new business formation density reported by Doing Business for 30 emerging countries in the period from 2004 through 2011 to evaluate the impact of devaluation measured by the behavior of the real effective exchange rate (REER) on the rate of new business formation (NBF). It is determined how variables associated with competitiveness affect the relationship between devaluation and business formation. Results show that devaluation has a positive effect on NBF in the short term, which gets diluted in the long term. Countries with greater competitiveness have less dependence on devaluation to increase the number of businesses.


Author(s):  
Jolanda Hessels ◽  
Udo Brixy ◽  
Wim Naude ◽  
Thomas Gries

1984 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 74-82 ◽  
Author(s):  
William R. Hambrecht

Today, new business formation and venture capital have been enjoying an unprecedented popularity. Even the popular news magazines have discovered venture capital and the industry has probably received more public coverage in the last three years than in all of its previous history. This is pretty heady stuff to a group of people who for many years had trouble explaining what they did for a living to their wives. What's happened? Is it a fad or has something really fundamental happened?


2007 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 73-84 ◽  
Author(s):  
Josep Maria Arauzo Carod ◽  
Daniel Liviano Solís ◽  
Mònica Martín Bofarull

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document