A topic-level influence network for a social-group recommendation

Author(s):  
J. Wang ◽  
H. Zhao ◽  
Z. J. Liu
2020 ◽  
Vol 32 (3) ◽  
pp. 453-467 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dong Qin ◽  
Xiangmin Zhou ◽  
Lei Chen ◽  
Guangyan Huang ◽  
Yanchun Zhang

2013 ◽  
Vol 105 ◽  
pp. 30-37 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zheng-Jun Zha ◽  
Qi Tian ◽  
Junjie Cai ◽  
Zengfu Wang

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (5) ◽  
pp. 1278-1287
Author(s):  
Zhenhua Huang ◽  
Juan Ni ◽  
Juanjuan Yao ◽  
Xin Xu ◽  
Bo Zhang ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 47 (2) ◽  
pp. 209-231 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ingrid Christensen ◽  
Silvia Schiaffino ◽  
Marcelo Armentano

2018 ◽  
Vol Volume-2 (Issue-3) ◽  
pp. 1118-1121
Author(s):  
Ms. Nikita S. Mohite ◽  
Mr. H. P. Khandagale ◽  

2018 ◽  
Vol 33 (4) ◽  
pp. 727-738 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peng-Peng Zhao ◽  
Hai-Feng Zhu ◽  
Yanchi Liu ◽  
Zi-Ting Zhou ◽  
Zhi-Xu Li ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 209 ◽  
pp. 3-13 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kyoungsoo Bok ◽  
Jongtae Lim ◽  
Heetae Yang ◽  
Jaesoo Yoo

2013 ◽  
Vol 44 (5) ◽  
pp. 311-319 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marco Brambilla ◽  
David A. Butz

Two studies examined the impact of macrolevel symbolic threat on intergroup attitudes. In Study 1 (N = 71), participants exposed to a macrosymbolic threat (vs. nonsymbolic threat and neutral topic) reported less support toward social policies concerning gay men, an outgroup whose stereotypes implies a threat to values, but not toward welfare recipients, a social group whose stereotypes do not imply a threat to values. Study 2 (N = 78) showed that, whereas macrolevel symbolic threat led to less favorable attitudes toward gay men, macroeconomic threat led to less favorable attitudes toward Asians, an outgroup whose stereotypes imply an economic threat. These findings are discussed in terms of their implications for understanding the role of a general climate of threat in shaping intergroup attitudes.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document