scholarly journals Resistance to Extinction of the Partial Delay of Reward Concerning the Few-trial PRE

1975 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. 63-71 ◽  
Author(s):  
MASATO ISHIDA
1968 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. 321-328 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Thomas Surridge ◽  
Karen R. Mock ◽  
Abram Amsel

Four groups of albino rats were run four trials a day in a straight runway for 44 days. On the first 15 days, two groups were given continuous immediate reward (IR) and two groups a 50 per cent, schedule of 30-sec. partial delay of reward (PDR). On the next 15 days, one IR group and one PDR group were extinguished, while the other IR and PDR groups remained on their original schedules. In the third phase, all groups received 8 days of training on IR. Finally, all groups were given 6 days of extinction training. In the first extinction, PDR produced greater resistance to extinction than IR. In the second extinction period, the PDR group which had previously been given extinction and the two IR groups extinguished relatively rapidly and at approximately the same rates, while the PDR group which had not been extinguished was significantly more resistant to extinction than the other three groups.


1962 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 275-278 ◽  
Author(s):  
James Schoonard ◽  
Douglas H. Lawrence

1969 ◽  
Vol 17 (5) ◽  
pp. 303-305 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lee E. Overstreet ◽  
Patrick E. Campbell

1966 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 167-171
Author(s):  
K. Edward Renner

Ss receiving partial delay of reward showed better differential learning with a brightness cue given on the delay trials than did Ss receiving partial reinforcement for which the cue was given on nonreward trials. Partial delay of reinforcement resulted in faster start latencies on the trials in which reinforcement was immediate than occurred for continuous immediate reinforcement. The decremental effects of constant delay of reinforcement on performance were eliminated when a sufficient number of trials were given.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document