scholarly journals Surgical management of middle ear cholesteatoma and reconstruction at the same time

2014 ◽  
pp. 127-131 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pedro Blanco ◽  
Francisco Gonzales ◽  
Jorge Holguin ◽  
Claudia Guerra

Introduction. The surgical management of cholesteatoma. You can opt for a closed technique (mastoidectomy simple) or open surgery (radical mastoidectomy). The open mastoidectomy with reconstruction of the posterior wall of the middle ear reconstruction in one surgery combines the advantages of both techniques as adequate surgical exposure, eradication of cholesteatoma and anatomical reconstruction of the middle ear structures. Objective. To evaluate the surgical results in the management of cholesteatoma with the technique of open mastoidectomy with reconstruction of the posterior wall and the middle ear in one surgery. Methods. Prospective analytical observational study conducted between 2009-2012 with patients undergoing this surgical technique in the Hospital Universitario del Valle, performing preoperative clinical monitoring and quarterly postoperative tomography and previous assessments of hearing and pre -and postoperative audiometry. Results. 45 patients were studied. Mean Postoperative follow-up was 28 months. Surgical success was achieved in 93.3% of patients as measured by clinical and radiological follow. Hearing preservation was found after reconstruction of the hearing mechanism, based on measured audiometry auditory tone average (PTA) by the statistical test for paired samples between preoperative and postoperative PTA. (95% CI -1.47 to 12.15). Residual cholesteatoma was presented in 6.6%, three to four times lower than that reported in the literature. Conclusions. This type of surgery can be considered a successful technique in the treatment of cholesteatoma in selected cases.

1992 ◽  
Vol 112 (2) ◽  
pp. 322-327 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. W. Blayney ◽  
K. R. Williams ◽  
J.-P. Erre ◽  
T. H. J. Lesser ◽  
M. Portmann

1996 ◽  
Vol 115 (2) ◽  
pp. P174-P175
Author(s):  
Takao Yabe ◽  
Kazuoki Kodera ◽  
Jun-Ichi Suzuki ◽  
Shigehiko Itoh

2013 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
pp. 587-594 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Zaoui ◽  
J. Kromeier ◽  
M. Neudert ◽  
T. Beleites ◽  
T. Zahnert ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 124 (11) ◽  
pp. 1162-1166
Author(s):  
T Sasaki ◽  
A Xu ◽  
K Ito ◽  
S-I Ishimoto ◽  
T Yamasoba ◽  
...  

AbstractObjectives:Upon direct inspection of surgically removed ossicles from the ears of patients with long-term post-mastoidectomy cavity problems, the extent of malleus destruction often appears greater in patients with a longer duration of cavity problems, whereas the extent of incus destruction does not appear to correlate with the duration of cavity problems. This study aimed to investigate this impression.Materials and methods:As a result of total middle-ear reconstruction, 41 ossicles (21 malleus and 20 incus bones) were obtained from 31 patients with post-mastoidectomy cavity problems. The ossicles were examined histopathologically, and the proportion of lamellar bone area to total bone area (expressed as percentage lamellar bone) was measured. We also calculated the inter-operation time, i.e. the time period between the previous mastoidectomy and the recent total middle-ear reconstruction; this parameter was used as an approximate measure of the duration of the patient's cavity problem. Correlations between percentage lamellar bone and inter-operation time were calculated for the two ossicles.Results:The range of inter-operation times was seven to 65 years. We observed a correlation between percentage lamellar bone and inter-operation time for malleus bones (r = −0.512, p < 0.05), but not for incus bones.Conclusion:These results were in agreement with our pre-study impressions.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document