scholarly journals Toward a Crip-of-Color Critique: Thinking with Minich's 'Enabling Whom?'

Lateral ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jina B Kim
Keyword(s):  
Disability Studies ◽  
Critical Disability Studies ◽  
Academic Labor

Response to Julie Avril Minich, "Enabling Whom? Critical Disability Studies Now," published in Lateral 5.1. Kim elaborates upon a crip-of-color critique, which has possibilities to both criticize structures that inherently devalue humans and to take action to work toward justice. Kim’s final call is to identify and act against the inequalities and harm of academic labor, urging readers to take seriously a “politics of refusal” that might help academics of color survive through alternative collectivities.

Recent Work in Critical Disability Studies

Paragraph ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 41 (2) ◽  
pp. 233-244
Author(s):  
Hannah Thompson
Keyword(s):  
Recent Work ◽  
Disability Studies ◽  
Critical Disability Studies

scholarly journals Historical Epistemology as Disability Studies Methodology: From the Models Framework to Foucault’s Archaeology of Cure

2015 ◽  
pp. 108-134 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aimi Hamraie
Keyword(s):  
Disability Studies ◽  
Biomedical Knowledge ◽  
Historical Epistemology ◽  
Critical Disability Studies ◽  
Medical Authority ◽  
Disability History ◽  
Models Of Disability ◽  
The Social ◽  
History Of ◽  
Construction Of Disability

In this article, I argue for historical epistemology as a methodology for critical disability studies (DS) by examining Foucault’s archaeology of cure in History of Madness. Although the moral, medical, and social models of disability frame disability history as an advancement upon moral and medical authority and a replacement of it by sociopolitical knowledge, I argue that the more comprehensive frame in which these models circulate—the “models framework”—requires the more nuanced approach that historical epistemology offers. In particular, the models framework requires greater use of epistemology as an analytical tool for understanding the historical construction of disability. Thus, I turn to Foucault’s History of Madness in order to both excavate one particular archaeological strand in the text—the archaeology of cure—and to demonstrate how this narrative disrupts some of the key assumptions of the models framework, challenging DS to consider the epistemological force of non-medical fields of knowledge for framing disability and procedures for its cure and elimination. I conclude by arguing that DS must develop historical epistemological methodologies that are sensitive to the complex overlays of moral, medical, and social knowledge, as well as attend to the social construction of scientific and biomedical knowledge itself.

Introduction: Disabling the Human

2020 ◽  
pp. 9-34
Author(s):  
Stuart Murray
Keyword(s):  
Disability Studies ◽  
First Century ◽  
Critical Disability Studies ◽  
Wizard Of Oz ◽  
Twenty First Century

Introduces the central features of the book: a concentration of critical disability studies and posthuman theory; questions of embodiment and technology; the focus on twenty- and twenty-first- century literatures and twenty-first-century film. The introduction also outlines the contents of the chapters and has a particular focus on the writings of L. Frank Baum, especially The Wonderful Wizard of Oz.

scholarly journals Provocations for Critical Disability Studies

2019 ◽  
Vol 34 (6) ◽  
pp. 972-997 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dan Goodley ◽  
Rebecca Lawthom ◽  
Kirsty Liddiard ◽  
Katherine Runswick-Cole
Keyword(s):  
Disability Studies ◽  
Critical Disability Studies

Enabling Militarism? The Inclusion of Soldiers with Disabilities in the Israeli Military

2019 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 430-446 ◽  
Author(s):  
James Eastwood
Keyword(s):  
International Relations ◽  
Intellectual Disabilities ◽  
Disability Studies ◽  
Settler Colonialism ◽  
Critical Disability Studies ◽  
Military Studies

Abstract Soldiers are rarely imagined as having disabilities, other than when they are injured in war. Yet in recent years the Israeli military has devoted considerable resources to programs promoting the inclusion of soldiers with intellectual disabilities. This paper critically examines two such programs, arguing that they should prompt a reexamination of assumptions in both critical military studies and critical disability studies. These two fields are rarely placed in dialogue, especially in international relations. Yet this paper argues that they have productive insights to offer each other and suggests that the Israeli case raises important questions when their analytical frames are combined. First, the paper argues that this example complicates the category of soldier fitness in critical military studies and reveals that militarist distinctions between ability and disability can be destabilized in ways suggested elsewhere by critical disability studies. Second, however, the paper cautions that the emancipatory potential of alternative “crip” subjectivities explored in critical disability studies remains circumscribed by geopolitical processes (including neoliberalism, settler colonialism, and militarism), which international relations is well placed to analyze. These arguments are advanced by showing how these inclusionary programs for soldiers with disabilities are implicated in the debilitating violence of Israel's settler colonial project.

scholarly journals Understanding critical disability studies

2014 ◽  
Vol 186 (16) ◽  
pp. 1248-1249 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Reaume
Keyword(s):  
Disability Studies ◽  
Critical Disability Studies
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document