The experience of absorbable knotless wound closure device used in laparoscopic myomectomy

Author(s):  
Chying-Chyuan Chan
2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 ◽  
pp. 1-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chying-Chyuan Chan ◽  
Ching-Yu Lee

Purpose.Myomectomy has been performed through laparoscopy. Suturing is known as rate-limiting step in laparoscopic myomectomy. The present study was aimed at comparing the clinical outcomes of absorbable knotless wound closure device with the results of conventional suturing.Methods. This prospective study included 62 women who underwent laparoscopic myomectomy at Taipei City Hospital, Zhongxiao Branch, from January 2010 through to August 2012. The patients were randomized into two groups according to suturing materials, the knotless group and the 2-0 Vicryl suture group. Patient demographics, overall operative time, and intraoperative blood loss were compared between two groups.Results. Demographic characteristics and laboratory variables before surgery were comparable. Operative time was significantly shorter in knotless group compared with that in 2-0 Vicryl suture group (112±47versus147±63minutes;p<0.05). The results revealed a significant difference in intraoperative blood loss between two groups (knotless versus 2-0 Vicryl:112.8±54.2versus143.6±64.9). Use of absorbable knotless wound closure device was associated with greater hemostasis compared with that of 2-0 Vicryl. During a 2-year follow-up period, 12 patients (46.2%) from the group with absorbable knotless wound closure device and 14 patients (38.9%) from 2-0 Vicryl suture group became pregnant.Conclusion.Closure of myometrium using absorbable knotless wound closure device after laparoscopic myomectomy resulted in a shorter operative time and less blood loss.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew J. Thomas ◽  
Sachin Gupta ◽  
Aclan Dogan ◽  
Timothy L. Smith ◽  
Justin Cetas ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 45 (5) ◽  
pp. 809-814 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hannah Rachel Bussell ◽  
Christoph Alexander Aufdenblatten ◽  
Corina Gruenenfelder ◽  
Stefan Altermatt ◽  
Sasha Job Tharakan

1995 ◽  
Vol 35 (5) ◽  
pp. 485-491 ◽  
Author(s):  
Krishna Narayanan ◽  
J William Futrell ◽  
Michael Bentz ◽  
Dennis Hurwitz

2020 ◽  
Vol 76 (4) ◽  
pp. S44
Author(s):  
T. Nizami ◽  
A. Aluisio ◽  
G. Jay ◽  
R. Bhatt ◽  
T. Feroze ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

Allergy ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 65 (6) ◽  
pp. 798-799 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. M. Dunst ◽  
J. Auboeck ◽  
B. Zahel ◽  
B. Raffier ◽  
G. M. Huemer

2006 ◽  
Vol 58 (suppl_4) ◽  
pp. ONS-E371-ONS-E371 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel J. Donovan ◽  
Donald A. Person

Abstract Objective and Importance: Carcinoma of the adnexal structures of the skin is a rare malignancy, and is even more unusual in the scalp. We report an unusual case of scalp adnexal carcinoma of eccrine origin that went untreated for years, resulting in a giant tumor with extension through the cranium. The tumor resection and reconstruction of the cranium and scalp defects posed unique challenges. Clinical Presentation: A 54-year-old woman experienced a large recurrence of her scalp adnexal carcinoma after an incomplete wide local excision, which invaded through the cranium. Intervention: The entire vertex of the scalp and cranium were removed en bloc. After cranioplasty, a free vascularized muscle flap was used for soft tissue coverage, but failed owing to poor vascular inflow. A large area of dura was left open, using a vacuum-assisted wound closure device to generate granulation tissue by secondary intention. Another split thickness skin graft was used to provide a cosmetically acceptable outcome. Conclusion: Scalp adnexal tumors of eccrine origin rarely metastasize and can be resected for cure with complete removal. Reconstruction options for large scalp and cranial tumors may be limited, and allowing the dura to granulate by secondary intention has been very rarely described. The novel use of a vacuum-assisted wound closure device was a very useful adjunct in this situation, and may be beneficial in the reconstruction of other patients with large scalp and cranial defects after neurosurgical procedures. It should be used with caution, since it may risk injury to a major venous sinus, especially when used in the midline, or cerebrospinal fluid leakage.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document