Negative centralisation of HIV/AIDS trauma and health-related quality of life: do post-traumatic stress symptoms explain the link?

2020 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 206-213
Author(s):  
Desmond Uchechukwu Onu ◽  
Steven Kator Iorfa ◽  
Dorothy I Ugwu
2015 ◽  
Vol 32 (11) ◽  
pp. 853-862 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juanita A. Haagsma ◽  
Annemieke C. Scholten ◽  
Teuntje M.J.C. Andriessen ◽  
Pieter E. Vos ◽  
Ed F. Van Beeck ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Eline Aas ◽  
Sanju Silwal ◽  
Pascal Renee Cyr ◽  
Tonje Holt ◽  
Silje M Ormhaug ◽  
...  

The objective of this study was to compare Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) as measured by the 16D instrument with four condition-specific instruments in children and adolescents with significant post-traumatic stress disease (PTSD), to assess the validity of the 16D instrument. In addition, we test for differences in health for the PTSD population compared to a representative sample of Finnish schoolchildren. The study included 156 children and adolescents with trauma-related symptoms in Norway. The condition-specific instruments included were; Child PTDS Symptom Scale (CPSS); Mood and Feelings Questionnaire (MFQ); Screen for Child Anxiety Related Emotional Disorders (SCARED), and; Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ). We found that the 16D HRQoL score was significantly correlated with all condition-specific instruments (CPSS, SCARED, MFQ, and SDQ), where SCARED had the highest correlation with the 16D (-0.659, p < 0.01). Several of the corresponding items (sleep, distress, discomfort and symptoms, mental functioning, and school and hobbies) of the condition-specific instruments were correlated above the threshold (convergent validity, ρ > 0.4). Children and adolescents with symptoms of post-traumatic stress experienced a significant health loss of 0.177 compared to a representative sample of Finnish 12 to 15-years-old schoolchildren with a Cohen’s d of 1.07, and the health difference was significant for all 16 dimensions. These findings support the use of the 16D to measure health outcomes in cost-utility analysis. More studies are needed to examine the responsiveness. Published: Online August 2020.


2011 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 99-103 ◽  
Author(s):  
James O. E. Pittman ◽  
Abigail A. Goldsmith ◽  
Jennifer A. Lemmer ◽  
Michael T. Kilmer ◽  
Dewleen G. Baker

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document