scholarly journals Međuknjižnična posudba u eri digitalne dostupnosti znanstvenih informacija

2021 ◽  
Vol 63 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 185
Author(s):  
Sofija Konjević

Cilj. Rad daje prikaz utjecaja tehnoloških promjena, osobito mrežne dostupnosti e-izvora znanstvenih informacija na službu međuknjižnične posudbe koristeći kao primjer podatke o međuknjižničnoj posudbi (MKP) Centra za znanstvene informacije, uz osvrt na trendove u Europi i svijetu. Pristup. Rad donosi kratak povijesni pregled razvoja službe međuknjižnične posudbe, prikaz tehnoloških promjena, s naglaskom na dostupnost građe u digitalnom formatu bilo pretplatom ili u otvorenom pristupu i promjene koje donosi, istovremeno olakšavajući proces međuknjižnične posudbe, ali i donoseći određena ograničenja. Analizirani su podaci o broju zahtjeva u Centru za znanstvene informacije Instituta Ruđer Bošković, a dat je i pregled današnje situacije u svijetu. Rezultati. Analiza je pokazala da velik broj zahtjeva za međuknjižničnom posudbom CZI bilježi sve do 2013. godine, nakon čega je registriran konstantan pad u broju zahtjeva, što je u skladu i s nekim primjerima u svijetu koji su prikazani u radu. Originalnost. Tema je obrađivana u prošlosti, no malo je novijih radova u Hrvatskoj koji obrađuju utjecaj tehnoloških promjena i digitalne građe na samu službu međuknjižnične posudbe, dajući pri tom opsežan pregled trenutnog stanja u svijetu. U svijetlu navedenih promjena su analizirani i prikazani statistički podaci međuknjižnične posudbe Centra za znanstvene informacije. Ključne riječi: međuknjižnična posudba, MKP, dostava dokumenata, opskrba dokumenata, e-izvori, znanstvene informacije Rad je na hrvatskom jeziku prezentiran na Stručnom skupu Izgradnja, upravljanje i evaluacija zbirki, 12.4.2019., Zagreb, Hrvatska, a na engleskom jeziku na konferenciji River of no Return: Sail or Sink: 18th Biennial Conference of the European Association of Aquatic Sciences Libraries and Information Centres (EURASLIC), 6-9.5.2019., Zagreb, Hrvatska. Prošireni sažetak na engleskom jeziku je objavljen u zborniku konferencije EURASLIC

2015 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 100-107 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karolina S. Follis ◽  
Christian R. Rogler

In 2004, Susan Brin Hyatt reported from a roundtable session organised by the American Anthropological Association ‘a dispiriting picture of academic life in the early years of the 21st century’, due to, amongst other things, ‘the casualization of the academic workforce’ (Hyatt 2004: 25–26). Less than a decade later, Joëlle Fanghanel notes that the ‘increased casualization of academic staff [has] significantly affected the evolution of academic work and working patterns’ (2012: 5). Casualisation takes different forms in different academic contexts, from the ‘adjunctification’ of teaching in the U.S.A. to precarious grant-funded postdoc positions common in Europe and the U.K. and the efforts to introduce other forms of temporary academic employment in New Zealand (Shore and Davidson 2014) and Australia (Barcan 2014). Seeking to contribute to these and other current discussions on the future of research and higher education in the era of privatisation and funding cuts, Hana Cervinkova and Karolina Follis convened the panel Anthropology as a Vocation and Occupation, held on 3 August 2014 at the 13th Biennial Conference of the European Association of Social Anthropologists (EASA) in Tallinn, Estonia.


Focaal ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 (63) ◽  
pp. 3-7
Author(s):  
Michele Hanks

The articles in this theme section are based on papers presented at a three-session workshop on World Anthropologies at the 2008 Biennial Conference of the European Association of Social Anthropologists in Ljubljana, Slovenia. Drawing on analyses of the position of anthropological disciplinary practices in Poland, Spain, Hungary, and the US, as well as their global reception, these articles ask important and timely questions about where anthropologists conduct their research, what professional and academic societies they join, what types of relationships they should forge with scholars who live in the country or nation in which they conduct fieldwork, and how they should engage with other disciplines beyond anthropology. As these articles demonstrate, practices of collaboration are enmeshed in politically, socially, and geographically grounded histories. Although at some level this may not be a surprise to readers, specific issues remain well worth examining further and discussing within the profession.


2011 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 111-117 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ype H. Poortinga ◽  
Ingrid Lunt

The European Association of Psychologists’ Associations (EFPA) was created in 1981 as the European Association of Professional Psychologists’ Associations (EFPPA). We show that Shakespeare’s dictum “What’s in a name?” does not apply here and that the loss of the “first P” (the adjectival “professional”) was resisted for almost two decades and experienced by many as a serious loss. We recount some of the deliberations preceding the change and place these in a broader historical context by drawing parallels with similar developments elsewhere. Much of the argument will refer to an underlying controversy between psychology as a science and the practice of psychology, a controversy that is stronger than in most other sciences, but nevertheless needs to be resolved.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document