Sodium Phosphates Rectal Solution

Keyword(s):  
2009 ◽  
Vol 23 ◽  
pp. 90-93
Author(s):  
Adly A. Hanna ◽  
Marwa A. Sherief ◽  
Reham M. M. Morsi

2016 ◽  
Vol 511 ◽  
pp. 156-167 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wooyoung Kim ◽  
Wookyun Shin ◽  
Kyoung Jun Lee ◽  
Hyohak Song ◽  
Hyung Soon Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

1954 ◽  
Vol 46 (9) ◽  
pp. 1938-1942 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. C Hafford
Keyword(s):  

2011 ◽  
Vol 31 (2) ◽  
pp. 134-143 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hande Demirkiran ◽  
Yongfeng Hu ◽  
Lucia Zuin ◽  
Narayana Appathurai ◽  
Pranesh B. Aswath

2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erina Kumagai ◽  
Tomoyoshi Shibuya ◽  
Masae Makino ◽  
Takashi Murakami ◽  
Shiori Takashima ◽  
...  

Optimal bowel preparation is essential for the safety and outcome of colonoscopy. A solution containing polyethylene glycol (PEG) is often used as a bowel cleansing agent, but some patients are intolerant of PEG, and this may lead to discontinuation of colonoscopy. Sodium phosphates (NaP) tablets are designed to improve patient acceptance and compliance. The objective of this study was to compare bowel preparation efficiency and patient acceptance of a 30 NaP tablet preparation (L-NaP) and a 2 L PEG preparation. Patients were randomized into either the L-NaP or PEG group. The primary endpoint was the efficiency of colon cleansing as assessed by a validated four-point scale according to the Aronchick scale by endoscopists and was verified by blinded investigators. The secondary endpoints were patients’ tolerability and acceptance. Colon-cleansing efficiency was not significantly different between the two preparations. However, patients’ overall judgment was significantly in favor of L-NaP, reflecting better acceptance of L-NaP than PEG. Additionally, more patients favored L-NaP over PEG in a hypothetical future occasion requiring colonoscopy.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document