The Assessment of Clinically Significant Change Using the Life Skills Profile

1997 ◽  
Vol 31 (2) ◽  
pp. 257-263 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tom Trauer ◽  
Robert A. Duckmanton ◽  
Edmond Chiu

Objective: In the context of the need to develop practical outcome measures, the present study aimed to assess the sensitivity of the Life Skills Profile (LSP) in terms of differences between hospital-based and community-based clients, and to assess the sensitivity of the LSP to changes over time. In this way, criteria could be established whereby the LSP could be used to determine appropriate changes in locus of care, both in terms of the ‘cut-off’ for hospital-based and community-based tenure, and the level of ‘clinically significant change’ in functioning. Method: The LSP was administered at 3-monthly intervals to 200 clients of an area public mental health service with serious mental illness over a 21-month period. Locus of care (hospital or community) was noted at each administration. Results: Clients in the community scored significantly better than those in hospital, however there was a great deal of overlap. Using hospital or community tenure as the variable of interest, a measure of reliable and clinically significant change over a 3-month period based on the LSP was developed. A total LSP score of 116.5 or above best discriminated clients in the community from those in hospital, and a difference of 18 points or more in two LSP obtained 3 months apart was unlikely to have arisen by chance. A simple, two-part criterion of significant change based on these results showed 89% accuracy in matching transition (or lack of transition) between hospital and community with changes in LSP scores. Conclusions: The results need to be understood within the methodological limitations of the present study. The findings provide users of the LSP with guidelines for the interpretation of repeat assessments. This may encourage more services to use formal reassessment methods to monitor the progress of their clients.

2005 ◽  
Vol 39 (8) ◽  
pp. 719-724 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alberto Parabiaghi ◽  
Angelo Barbato ◽  
Barbara D'avanzo ◽  
Arcadio Erlicher ◽  
Antonio Lora

Objective: Many authors recommended that reliable and clinically significant change (RCSC) should be calculated when reporting results of interventions. To test the reliability of the Health of the Nation Outcome Scales (HoNOS) in identifying RCSC, we applied the Jacobson and Truax model to two HoNOS assessments in a large group of people evaluated in 10 community mental health services in Lombardy, Italy, in 2000. Method: The HoNOS was administered to 9817 patients; of these, 4759 (48%) were re-assessed. Reliable change (RC) was calculated using Cronbach's alpha ( α), as a parameter of the reliability of the measure. Clinical significance cut-offs were calculated using a classification of severity based on HoNOS items. Results: In the whole sample, the clinical improvement cut-off was 11 and the remission cut-off was 5. Considering the severe patients, the clinical improvement cut-off was 12. The RC index calculated on the whole group and on the subgroup of severe patients indicated that eight-point and seven-point changes, respectively, were needed to be confident that a real change had occurred. Longitudinal changes were depicted on two-dimensional graphs as examples of reporting RCSC on HoNOS total scores in a routine data collection: 91.6% of the whole sample (4361) was stable, 5.6% (269) improved and 1.8% (129) worsened. Conclusion: Our study proposes a methodological framework for computing RCSC normative data on a widely used outcome scale and for identifying different degrees of clinical change.


Psychotherapy ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 46 (3) ◽  
pp. 328-335 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joshua K. Swift ◽  
Jennifer Callahan ◽  
Jason C. Levine

2019 ◽  
Vol 281 ◽  
pp. 112587 ◽  
Author(s):  
Albert E. Boon ◽  
Sjoukje B.B. de Boer ◽  
Melissa van Dorp ◽  
Yolanda A.M. Nijssen

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document