Biomechanical Evaluation of Refractory Chronic Low Back Pain Treatment with Botulinum Toxin Type A

2014 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 152-159
Author(s):  
Se Jin Yoon ◽  
Sun Hong Song ◽  
Young Jin Kim ◽  
Ho Young Kang ◽  
Sang Ho Lee
2011 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 77-80 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seyed M. Jazayeri ◽  
Alireza Ashraf ◽  
Habib M. Fini ◽  
Hajar Karimian ◽  
Mohamadreza V. Nasab

2011 ◽  
Vol 122 ◽  
pp. S93
Author(s):  
R. Di Giacopo ◽  
A. Guidubaldi ◽  
T. Ialongo ◽  
A. Bentivoglio

2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Luis Miguel Torres ◽  
Antonio Javier Jiménez ◽  
Ana Cabezón ◽  
Manuel Jesús Rodríguez

Chronic low back pain (CLBP) is highly prevalent in industrialized countries, where it is one of the main causes of disability. Patients with CLBP in treatment with opioids often experience episodes of breakthrough pain (BTP), but data on prevalence and treatment preferences are scarce. The objectives of this study were, first, the evaluation of the prevalence of BTP in patients with CLBP in the South of Spain (N=1,868) and, second, the characterization of BTP in these patients (N=295). Data was collected on presence of BTP, type and location of pain, treatment, compliance, and patient satisfaction. We found a prevalence of BTP in patients with CLBP of 37.5% (95% CI: 35.3%–39.7%), similar in men and women. 75% of the patients were older than 50 years. The preferred drug of patients who control BTP with opioids is fentanyl (78.3%) and its most common form of administration is nasal (53.2%). Therapeutic compliance was high and 46.3% of patients considered the control of their BTP very satisfactory. Our study showed that BTP is common in patients with CLBP and that current treatments seem adequate.


2016 ◽  
Vol 124 (1) ◽  
pp. 150-158 ◽  
Author(s):  
Regina P. Schukro ◽  
Matthias J. Oehmke ◽  
Angelika Geroldinger ◽  
Georg Heinze ◽  
Hans-Georg Kress ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Among patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP), approximately 37% show signs of a neuropathic pain component (radicular pain). Treatment of this condition remains challenging. Therefore, the current study aimed to investigate the efficacy of duloxetine in the treatment of CLBP patients with neuropathic leg pain. Methods The study was conducted as a prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind crossover trial. CLBP with a visual analog scale (VAS) score greater than 5 and a neuropathic component that was assessed clinically and by the painDETECT questionnaire (score > 12) were required for inclusion. Patients were randomly assigned to either duloxetine or placebo for 4 weeks followed by a 2-week washout period before they crossed over to the alternate phase that lasted another 4 weeks. Duloxetine was titrated up to 120 mg/day. The primary outcome parameter was mean VAS score during the last week of treatment in each phase (VASweek4). Results Of 41 patients, 21 patients completed both treatment phases. In the intention-to-treat analysis (n = 25), VASweek4 was significantly lower in the duloxetine phase compared with placebo (4.1 ± 2.9 vs. 6.0 ± 2.7; P = 0.001), corresponding to an average pain reduction of 32%. The painDETECT score at the end of each treatment phase was significantly lower in the duloxetine phase compared with placebo (17.7 ± 5.7 vs. 21.3 ± 3.6 points; P = 0.0023). Adverse events were distributed equally between the duloxetine (65%) and placebo phases (62%) (P = 0.5). Conclusion In this crossover study, duloxetine proved to be superior to placebo for the treatment of CLBP with a neuropathic leg pain.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document