The role of hysteroscopy in investigating abnormal uterine bleeding

Background: Dilatation and curettage has long been the diagnostic gold standard for abnormal uterine bleeding. However, even a trained gynecological curettes at best 70-80% of the endometrium. Hysteroscopy is gaining acceptability over other diagnostic technique like dilatation and curettage, hysterosalpingogram and ultrasound. The objective of this study is to find out the role of hysteroscopy in abnormal uterine bleeding and to compare hysteroscopy findings with histopathology.Methods: Fifty patients in perimenopausal age group with abnormal uterine bleeding attending JSS Medical College and Hospital Mysore, during the period 1999-2001 were studied by diagnostic hysteroscopy followed by dilatation and curettage.Results: Mean age of the study group was 44.3% years (±2.5 SD). Menorrhagia was the commonest symptom and was found in 68% of the patients. Diagnostic hysteroscopy identified 23 cases as Normal endometrium, 16 cases as endometrial hyperplasia, 3 cases as atrophic endometrium, 4 cases as endometrial polyp, 4 cases as fibroids. Compared with histopathological findings as definitive diagnosis, hysteroscopy correctly picked up 19 cases of (86.9%), normal endometrium, 12 cases of hyperplasia (75%), 3 cases of atrophic endometrium (100%), 4 cases of polyps (100%), and 4 cases of fibroid (100%).Conclusions: Hysteroscopy should be considered as a basic and essential diagnostic procedure in the diagnostic work up of abnormal uterine bleeding.

Download Full-text

Role of hysteroscopy and histopathology in evaluating patients with abnormal uterine bleeding

International Journal of Reproduction Contraception Obstetrics and Gynecology ◽

10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20170393 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 6 (2) ◽

pp. 615 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Nighat Firdous ◽

Samar Mukhtar ◽

Sheikh Bilal ◽

Salma Kounsar Beigh

Keyword(s):

Predictive Value ◽

Endometrial Hyperplasia ◽

Abnormal Uterine Bleeding ◽

Uterine Bleeding ◽

Common Finding ◽

Endometrial Polyps ◽

Medical College ◽

Obstetrics And Gynaecology ◽

Definitive Role

Background: Abnormal uterine bleeding is one of the leading causes for seeking gynaecological advice. The aim and objectives of the study was to determine the pattern of hysteroscopic abnormalities and histopathological features of Abnormal Uterine Bleeding and to correlate hysteroscopic findings with histopathological findings.Methods: The present study “Role of Hysteroscopy and Histopathology in Evaluating patients with Abnormal Uterine Bleeding” was an observational study carried out in the Postgraduate Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology and Postgraduate Department of Pathology of Government Medical college, Srinagar after obtaining clearance from the institutional ethical committee. The period of the study was One and a Half Years from April 2014 to September 2015.Results: The most common abnormality detected by hysteroscopy was Endometrial Hyperplasia (27 cases, 27%) followed by endometrial polyps (21 cases, 21%). Endometrial Hyperplasia was the most common abnormality found in Menorrhagia followed by polyps while polyps were the most common finding in polymenorrhea and endometrial hyperplasia was the most common pathology in postmenopausal bleeding. Hysteroscopy had a sensitivity of 93.2%, specificity of 83.9%, positive predictive value of 82%, Negative Predictive Value of 94% in diagnosing etiology of abnormal uterine bleeding.Conclusions: This study confirms that hysteroscopy has a definitive role in evaluating patients with abnormal uterine bleeding and hysteroscopy and histopathology complement each other in the evaluation of a patient with Abnormal uterine bleeding.

Download Full-text