A Comparative Study on the Discourse Function of “Gwaen-chanh-da(괜찮다)” in Korean and “Meiguanxi(沒關系)” in Chinese

2017 ◽  
Vol 72 ◽  
pp. 229-251 
Author(s):  
Xiaoxue  Yuan  ◽  
Yun-gon Choi 
2005 ◽  
Vol 38 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 153-166
Author(s):  
Katja Plemenitaš

The article deals with nominalization as a linguistic form with a universal discourse function. lt offers an explanation ofthe discourse function of nominalization as a topicalization mechanism. From this stems the assumption that the use of nominalization is associated with specific text types, which is supported by a comparative study ofnominalizations carried out on a sample of English and Slovene newspaper articles from two different periods. The study tests some predictions with regard to the use and frequency of nominalizations in the sample, which are based on general assumptions about the function ofnominalizations and some previous obseniations about nominizing tendencies in English and Slovene. The results of this study show that both English and Slovene newspaper articles yield similar global patterns in the distribution of nominalization in connection with the text type.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bruno Oliveira Ferreira de Souza ◽  
Éve‐Marie Frigon ◽  
Robert Tremblay‐Laliberté ◽  
Christian Casanova ◽  
Denis Boire

2001 ◽  
Vol 268 (6) ◽  
pp. 1739-1748
Author(s):  
Aitor Hierro ◽  
Jesus M. Arizmendi ◽  
Javier De Las Rivas ◽  
M. Angeles Urbaneja ◽  
Adelina Prado ◽  
...  

1951 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 224-229 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph T. Freeman ◽  
Roberta Hafkesbring

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document