scholarly journals Socially contingent responsivity: finding a link between statistical learning and understanding the referential nature of words

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elena Luchkina

One of the central processes of language acquisition is word learning. While many species have been shown to learn word-object associations (e.g., Lyn & Savage-Rumbaugh, 2000; Kaminski, Call, & Fischer, 2004), humans understand the meanings of words and know that that words refer to certain objects, actions, or ideas, not merely recognize associative pairings. This paper explores the role of socially contingent responsivity in the development of the referential understanding of words.

2014 ◽  
Vol 24 (21) ◽  
pp. 2606-2611 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pablo Ripollés ◽  
Josep Marco-Pallarés ◽  
Ulrike Hielscher ◽  
Anna Mestres-Missé ◽  
Claus Tempelmann ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 112 (41) ◽  
pp. 12663-12668 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brandon C. Roy ◽  
Michael C. Frank ◽  
Philip DeCamp ◽  
Matthew Miller ◽  
Deb Roy

Children learn words through an accumulation of interactions grounded in context. Although many factors in the learning environment have been shown to contribute to word learning in individual studies, no empirical synthesis connects across factors. We introduce a new ultradense corpus of audio and video recordings of a single child’s life that allows us to measure the child’s experience of each word in his vocabulary. This corpus provides the first direct comparison, to our knowledge, between different predictors of the child’s production of individual words. We develop a series of new measures of the distinctiveness of the spatial, temporal, and linguistic contexts in which a word appears, and show that these measures are stronger predictors of learning than frequency of use and that, unlike frequency, they play a consistent role across different syntactic categories. Our findings provide a concrete instantiation of classic ideas about the role of coherent activities in word learning and demonstrate the value of multimodal data in understanding children’s language acquisition.


2009 ◽  
Vol 364 (1536) ◽  
pp. 3649-3663 ◽  
Author(s):  
Janet F. Werker ◽  
Krista Byers-Heinlein ◽  
Christopher T. Fennell

At the macrostructure level of language milestones, language acquisition follows a nearly identical course whether children grow up with one or with two languages. However, at the microstructure level, experimental research is revealing that the same proclivities and learning mechanisms that support language acquisition unfold somewhat differently in bilingual versus monolingual environments. This paper synthesizes recent findings in the area of early bilingualism by focusing on the question of how bilingual infants come to apply their phonetic sensitivities to word learning, as they must to learn minimal pair words (e.g. ‘cat’ and ‘mat’). To this end, the paper reviews antecedent achievements by bilinguals throughout infancy and early childhood in the following areas: language discrimination and separation, speech perception, phonetic and phonotactic development, word recognition, word learning and aspects of conceptual development that underlie word learning. Special consideration is given to the role of language dominance, and to the unique challenges to language acquisition posed by a bilingual environment.


2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Felix Hao Wang ◽  
Toben Herbert Mintz

Word learning involves massive ambiguity, since in a particular encounter with a novel word, there are an unlimited number of potential referents. One proposal for how learners surmount the problem of ambiguity is that learners use cross-situational statistics to constrain the ambiguity: When a word and its referent co-occur across multiple situations, learners will associate the word with the correct referent. Yu & Smith (2007) propose that these co-occurrence statistics are sufficient for word-to-referent mapping. Alternative accounts hold that co-occurrence statistics alone are insufficient to support learning, and that learners are further guided by knowledge that words are referential (e.g., Waxman & Gelman, 2009). However, no behavioral word learning studies we are aware of explicitly manipulate subjects’ prior assumptions about the role of the words in the experiments in order to test the influence of these assumptions. In this study, we directly test whether, when faced with referential ambiguity, co-occurrence statistics are sufficient for word-to-referent mappings in adult word-learners. Across a series of cross-situational learning experiments, we varied the degree to which there was support for the notion that the words were referential. At the same time, the statistical information about the words’ meanings was held constant. When we overrode support for the notion that words were referential, subjects failed to learn the word-to-referent mappings, but otherwise they succeeded. Thus, cross-situational statistics were useful only when learners had the goal of discovering mappings between words and referents. We discuss the implications of these results for theories of word learning in children’s language acquisition.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jelena Mirković ◽  
Marissa Yee ◽  
Maddison Kennedy ◽  
Marianna E. Hayiou-Thomas

Statistical learning plays a key role in language acquisition and development, from word segmentation to grammar learning. In a recent review and meta-analysis, Frost et al. (2019) identified key contributions of the statistical learning literature over the last 20 years, as well as a number of limitations. Here we address three of those limitations across three experiments. First, we address the issue of unrealistic learning environments in previous statistical learning research by training participants on an artificial language comprising multiple regularities (phonological, distributional, semantic), unlike the majority of previous statistical learning studies. Second, to examine learning at several levels of linguistic structure, we use a word learning paradigm at training, which allowed us to assess both word and grammar learning, including generalization of the trained regularities to previously unseen items. Third, to address the issue of underspecification of cognitive mechanisms underpinning statistical learning, we examine the emergence and role of explicit knowledge in generalization performance in both child and adult learners. Additionally, we examine the role of off-line memory consolidation processes. Across three experiments and multiple tasks, we found that both children and adults showed good levels of word learning, but variable levels of generalization of the trained grammatical regularities. Generalization success depended on the age group, type of training, and type of regularity assessed. Across all three experiments, explicit knowledge of the regularities contributed to the performance in some generalization tasks, but it was not key for successful generalization. Off-line consolidation processes consistently influenced long-term maintenance of the newly acquired lexical knowledge, but evidence of their role in grammar learning was mixed. We argue that our findings shed light on the cognitive mechanisms underpinning statistical learning, and provide evidence in support of multicomponential views of statistical learning.


2007 ◽  
Vol 62 (2) ◽  
pp. 253-265
Author(s):  
István Fekete ◽  
Mária Gósy ◽  
Rozália Eszter Ivády ◽  
Péter Kardos

DianePecherés RolfA. Zwaan(szerk.): Grounding cognition: The role of perception and action in memory, language, and thinking (Fekete István)     253 CsépeValéria: Az olvasó agy (Gósy Mária) 256 Kormos, Judit: Speech production and second language acquisition (Ivády Rozália Eszter)      260 MarosánGyörgy: Hogyan készül a történelem? (Kardos Péter) 263


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document