Latent diversity in human concepts
Many social and legal conflicts come down to differences in semantics. Yet, semantic variation between individuals and people’s awareness of this variation have been relatively neglected by experimental psychology. Here, across two experiments, we quantify the amount of agreement and disagreement between ordinary semantic concepts in thepopulation, as well as people’s meta-cognitive awareness of these differences. We collect similarity ratings and feature judgements, and analyze them using a non-parametricclustering scheme with an ecological statistical estimator to infer the number of different meanings for the same word that is present in the population. We find that typically atleast ten to twenty variants of meanings exist for even common nouns, but that people are unaware of this variation. Instead, people exhibit a strong bias to erroneously believe that other people share their particular semantics, pointing to one factor that likely interfereswith political and social discourse.