scholarly journals Role of cell block preparation in neoplastic lesions

2012 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
pp. 272-276 ◽  
Author(s):  
S Basnet ◽  
OP Talwar
Keyword(s):  
Diagnostic Accuracy ◽  
Fine Needle Aspiration ◽  
Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology ◽  
Needle Aspiration ◽  
Cell Block ◽  
Aspiration Cytology ◽  
Fine Needle ◽  
Biopsy Specimens ◽  
Neoplastic Lesions ◽  
Needle Aspiration Cytology

Background: Fine needle aspiration cytology of superficial lesion or deep anatomical site is an increasingly common procedure in diagnosis of neoplastic lesions. Sometimes fine needle aspiration does not yield sufficient information for precise diagnosis and the risk of false negative or intermediate diagnosis always exists. In order to overcome these problems, cell block technique has been resorted to make the best use of available material.Materials and Methods:This was a prospective hospital based study conducted in the department of pathology, Manipal Teaching Hospital, Pokhara, Nepal over a period of 2 years from the year 2009 October to 2011. There were total of 49 cases included in the study of which fine needle aspiration cytology smears, cell block and biopsy specimens were available.Results: A total of 49 such cases were included in the study of which fine needle aspiration cytology smears, cell block and biopsy specimens were available. Of all the malignant cases, 12 cases were from lungs aspirate, 10 were from breast, 15 from lymph node and 12 from thyroid. With the combined use of smear and cell block, the diagnostic accuracy of the tumors approaches 100% and also significantly improves diagnostic and sub typing accuracy of malignancies. Cell blocks were found superior in diagnosing neoplasm than smears with diagnostic accuracy of 95.91% and 91.8% respectively.Conclusion: Cell block method allows the recovery and processing of minute amounts of cellular material and facilitates the better classification of tumor when reviewed along with cytological smears. The method is simple to perform and no expertise is required to handle the specimen. Therefore the routine preparation of the cell block improves the accuracy of fine needle aspiration cytology diagnosis.Journal of Pathology of Nepal (2012) Vol. 2, 272-276DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3126/jpn.v2i4.6876

scholarly journals A comparative study of fine-needle aspiration cytology and histopathology in salivary gland lesions

1970 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 108-113 ◽  
Author(s):  
S Vaidya ◽  
A Sinha ◽  
S Narayan ◽  
S Adhikari ◽  
KC Sabira
Keyword(s):  
Salivary Gland ◽  
Diagnostic Accuracy ◽  
Fine Needle Aspiration ◽  
Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology ◽  
Needle Aspiration ◽  
Aspiration Cytology ◽  
Fine Needle ◽  
Neoplastic Lesions ◽  
Needle Aspiration Cytology ◽  
Sensitivity Specificity

Background: A wide variety of benign and malignant tumours originate in the salivary glands and insufficient tumour cells make their diagnosis difficult in some patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of fine-needle aspiration cytology in the diagnosis of salivary gland lesions and to correlate cytological findings with histopathology. Materials and Methods: This was a prospective study done from September 2002 to May 2004. Fine needle aspiration cytology was performed in 58 patients with clinically significant salivary gland masses. Results: Fine needle aspiration cytology categorized 67.24% of the salivary gland lesions as neoplastic and 32.76% as non-neoplastic lesions. Amongst the neoplastic lesions, 76.9% were benign and 23.1% were malignant cases. Histopathological examination revealed that 81.05% of the cases were benign and 18.95% were malignant. Fine needle aspiration cytology had a sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic accuracy of 81.82%, 100% and 96.55%, respectively. The positive predictive value and negative predictive value was 100% and 95.9%, respectively. Conclusion: Fine needle aspiration of the salivary gland is a safe and reliable technique in the primary diagnosis of salivary gland lesions. Although, limitations are encountered while predicting specific lesions on cytology, especially when dealing with cystic and some malignant lesions, this study has shown that fine needle aspiration cytology has a high sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic accuracy in diagnosing salivary gland lesions. Keywords: Salivary glands; Fine needle aspiration cytology; Histopathology DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3126/jpn.v1i2.5403 JPN 2011; 1(2): 108-113

Cell Block and Its Impact in the Diagnosis of Jaw Lesions over Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Kaveri Hallikeri ◽  
Biji Babu ◽  
Archana Sudhakaran ◽  
Roshni Monteiro
Keyword(s):  
Fine Needle Aspiration ◽  
Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology ◽  
Dentigerous Cyst ◽  
Needle Aspiration ◽  
Histopathological Diagnosis ◽  
Cell Block ◽  
Aspiration Cytology ◽  
Fine Needle ◽  
Dentigerous Cysts ◽  
Needle Aspiration Cytology

<b><i>Objectives:</i></b> To determine the role and efficacy of fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) and cell block in diagnosis of jaw lesions and compare the agreement between FNAC and cell block to predict the diagnosis. <b><i>Method:</i></b> The sample comprised 51 cases, including 12 odontogenic keratocysts (OKCs), 8 ameloblastomas, 22 radicular cysts, 7 dentigerous cysts, and 1 each of intraosseous mucoepidermoid carcinoma (MEC) and adenomatoid odontogenic tumor (AOT). FNAC samples remaining after hematoxylin and eosin (H&amp;E)-stained cytosmear diagnosis were centrifuged at 3,000 rpm for 10 min. The supernatant was discarded and sediment mixed with 2–3 mL alcohol and filtered. To this, 10% formalin was added, filtered, taken for routine processing, and stained with H&amp;E. The result of FNAC smear and cell block was compared with histopathological diagnosis. <b><i>Results:</i></b> On cytological examination of the smears, 7 OKCs and 22 radicular cysts were diagnosed, whereas ameloblastomas, AOT, intraosseous MEC, and dentigerous cysts were not. This gave an agreement of 56.8% with the biopsy reports. Cell block sections stained with H&amp;E of 12 OKCs, 22 radicular cysts, 1 MEC, and 3 cases of ameloblastoma offered a diagnosis in accordance with the biopsies giving an agreement of 74.5%, while dentigerous cyst and AOT failed to do so. In comparison with FNAC, additionally 5 cases of OKC and 1 of MEC could be detected, and in ameloblastoma, out of 8 cases, only 3 yielded a concordant diagnosis through the cell block technique. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> In comparison with FNAC, the architectural pattern and the morphology of the cells were better preserved by the cell block technique. This substantiates that cell block could be used as an ancillary technique to aid in definitive diagnosis of head and neck swellings.

scholarly journals A study of fine needle aspiration cytology in salivary gland lesions in a rural population

2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 307
Author(s):  
Anil R. Joshi ◽  
Dnyaneshwar S. Jadhav ◽  
Balaji D. Baste ◽  
Shweta K. Ranka
Keyword(s):  
Salivary Gland ◽  
Fine Needle Aspiration ◽  
Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology ◽  
Needle Aspiration ◽  
Primary Diagnosis ◽  
Aspiration Cytology ◽  
Reliable Technique ◽  
Fine Needle ◽  
Neoplastic Lesions ◽  
Needle Aspiration Cytology

Background: Fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) of suspected salivary gland lesions has an established role in preoperative diagnosis and management of patients. However diverse morphological patterns and overlapping features make it a challenging job, to give a precise diagnosis at times.Methods: This was a prospective study done from October 2011 to October 2013. Fine needle aspiration cytology was performed in 64 patients with clinically significant salivary gland lesions.Results: Fine needle aspiration cytology categorized 38 (59.4%) of the salivary gland lesions as neoplastic and 26 (40.6 %) as non- neoplastic lesions. Amongst the neoplastic lesions, 86.9% were benign and 13.2% were malignant cases.Conclusions: FNAC of the salivary gland is simple, cheap, safe and reliable technique in the primary diagnosis of salivary gland lesions.

scholarly journals Preoperative Multiparametric Ultrasound and Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology evaluation of parotid gland tumors: which is the best technique?

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Olga Guiban ◽  
Antonello Rubini ◽  
Daniele Fresilli ◽  
Giuseppe Tiziano Lucarelli ◽  
Massimo Ralli ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Parotid Gland ◽  
Diagnostic Accuracy ◽  
Fine Needle Aspiration ◽  
Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology ◽  
Needle Aspiration ◽  
Benign Lesions ◽  
Aspiration Cytology ◽  
Fine Needle ◽  
Needle Aspiration Cytology ◽  
Multiparametric Ultrasound

Aims: To evaluate the pre-surgical diagnostic value of Multiparametric Ultrasound (MPUS) and Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology (FNAC) in differentiating parotid gland tumors, comparing the results with histology. Materials and methods:The study enrolled 84 patients with parotid gland lesions surgically treated in a single tertiary center and evaluated by MPUS. Each patient underwent FNAC. Histological examination was considered the gold standard. Results: Histology identified 62 benign tumors and 22 malignancies. In the differential diagnosis between malignant and benign lesions, B-mode Ultrasound (US), Color-Doppler US, Contrast-Enhanced US (CEUS), Elastography (USE) and FNAC showed the following values of sensitivity: 82%, 81%, 86%, 77%, 73% respectively; specificity: 97%, 61%, 95%, 71%, 97% respectively; PPV: 90%, 43%, 86%, 50%, 89% respectively; NPV: 93%, 90%, 95%, 88%, 91% respectively; and accuracy: 89%, 71%, 90%, 78%, 84% re-spectively. Conclusions: CEUS proved to be a valid and accurate method for identifying malignant tumors of parotid gland; the combination of B-mode US with CEUS showed similar diagnostic accuracy, but better sensitivity than CEUS taken alone. USE did not improve the diagnostic performance of the B-mode US, alone or in association with CEUS; however, it revealed the highest diagnostic accuracy in the differentiation between benign lesions. FNAC demonstrated lower values in comparison with CEUS and with USE. Therefore, according to our study, MPUS could be proposed as a valid alternative to FNAC.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document