The occurrence of lipofuscin pigment as related to aging in the lumbar spinal cord, dorsal root ganglia and paravertebral ganglia of the dog and pig

1966 ◽  
Author(s):  
Albert Braxton Few
2003 ◽  
Vol 468 (3) ◽  
pp. 380-394 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marc Landry ◽  
Rabia Bouali-Benazzouz ◽  
Salah El Mestikawy ◽  
Philippe Ravassard ◽  
Fr�d�ric Nagy

2018 ◽  
Vol 14 ◽  
pp. 174480691881009 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yong Fang Zhu ◽  
Jacek M Kwiecien ◽  
Wojciech Dabrowski ◽  
Robert Ungard ◽  
Kan Lun Zhu ◽  
...  

1985 ◽  
Vol 63 (1) ◽  
pp. 97-105 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoichi Katayama ◽  
James D. Glisson ◽  
Donald P. Becker ◽  
Ronald L. Hayes

✓ This study examines the effects of concussive levels of a fluid-percussion head injury on sensory transmission within the lumbar spinal cord of the cat. Primary afferent depolarization (PAD) was suppressed for 2 to 5 minutes following injury, as assessed by dorsal root potentials and augmentation of antidromic dorsal root potentials, both evoked by stimulation of adjacent dorsal roots. Polysynaptic reflex discharges in ventral root potentials evoked by dorsal root stimulation were also profoundly suppressed during this same period, even when spontaneous and monosynaptic reflex discharges were facilitated. Changes in PAD produced by injury were abolished by spinal cord transection, but were not affected by midpontine transection. These findings suggest that concussive head injury can produce suppression of segmental sensory transmission by neurally mediated processes involving the bulbar brain stem. Recordings of dorsal root resting potentials, antidromic dorsal root potentials, and reductions of antidromic dorsal root potentials induced by tetanic root stimulation indicated that depressed segmental sensory function produced by injury was due to suppression of postsynaptic interneuronal transmission rather than to excitability changes in primary afferent fibers. Somatosensory cortical potentials evoked by dorsal root stimulation were profoundly depressed at the same time as segmental sensory transmission was suppressed, suggesting that suppressed segmental sensory transmission may also contribute to suppression of ascending sensory transmission. It is hypothesized that transmission failure of interneuronal systems in the initial period following insult may be a general response occurring in wide areas of the central nervous system, and not restricted to areas to which mechanical stress is directly applied. This response pattern may result from indiscriminate activation of interconnected excitatory and inhibitory elements of interneuronal systems.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document