A Study on Project Goals and Performance Evaluation System in Urban Regeneration Project Evaluation System

2019 ◽  
Vol 79 ◽  
pp. 67-79
Author(s):  
Kwang Sub Jeon
2014 ◽  
Vol 635-637 ◽  
pp. 1771-1775 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hui Min Jia ◽  
Kai Chao Yu ◽  
Jin Chang Zhang

Leagile supply chain integrates lean supply chain and agile supply chain. In this paper, the theory of lean production and agile manufacturing are compared and analyzed, and then the leagile supply chain model and the performance evaluation system based on DEA are established. Based on the above, this paper provides an example of the evaluation system to verify the operability and effectiveness, which can provide the reference for enterprises to improve operating mode of the supply chain or develop a new leagile supply chain.


Author(s):  
Gloria Cuevas-Rodríguez ◽  
Jaime Guerrero-Villegas ◽  
Ramón Valle-Cabrera

The aim of this paper is compare corporate governance and firm strategy before and after privatization. The design of control and performance evaluation systems in the pre and post-privatization periods is compared so that it can be understood in relation to the changes observed at a high corporate level (corporate governance and firm strategy). We carry out various case studies on five privatized Spanish companies. The results support several conclusions. First, the variables that are traditionally related to greater board independence in monitoring do not undergo variation after privatization. Second, the interests of the firms’ new ownership have an impact on firm strategy after privatization. Finally, control and performance evaluation system designs clearly align with firm strategy after privatization.


2020 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rachana Chattopadhyay

PurposeResearches have already pointed out the linkage between pro-male bias and performance evaluation system. The main aim of this study is to understand how far different dimensions of performance measures are susceptible to gender stereotype.Design/methodology/approachTwo separate experimental researches were designed to understand whether the performance assessment is purely based on objective criteria or it is governed by the gender stereotype. Two different performance dimensions of assessment were considered in this study as follows: interactional (behavioural) and procedural. 129 customer care managers from four metro cities of India voluntarily participated in this experimental research and played the role of performance evaluator. These managers were placed in different experimental conditions related to different combinations of gender and justice variations (interactional or procedural).FindingsThis study reveals that in violation of behaviour-based performance norm (interactional justice norm), female employees were rated less favourably than male employee both in terms of performance rating and reward recommendation by the managers, but it is not in case of procedural justice violation.Originality/valueThis article has experimentally proved how gender stereotype can distort the performance evaluation of behavioural dimension.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document