The Rural Community Building Based on the Commons: Focusing on Ecotourism in Harye-1-ri, Jeju-do

2020 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 58-80
Author(s):  
Ja Kyung Kim ◽  
Hyun Choe
2019 ◽  
Vol 34 (2) ◽  
pp. 187-207 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elena Meyer-Clement

‘Rural community building’ is one of the most prominent policies of rural urbanization and village renovation in China. Since the nationwide implementation of this policy within the scope of the programme ‘Building a new socialist countryside’, the large-scale construction of new residential complexes has accelerated the transformation of the country’s rural landscape. However, extensive demolition and relocation have drawn increasing criticism, and the policy has become synonymous with the seizure of rural land resources by local governments. When Xi Jinping came to power, the new leadership initially appeared to abandon the policy but has eventually revived it. This article studies the implementation and evolution of the rural community building policy as a case of policy learning. The analysis of national and local policy documents and implementation practices in four provinces highlights a new framing of the policy, more intensive hierarchical controls over rural land use, and the state’s increasing reach into village governance, as well as new incentives for local governments to continue with demolition and relocation projects. These changes reveal a mode of policy learning in the context of an authoritarian regime whose goal is to improve policy implementation in the face of growing public criticism and social tension.


2014 ◽  
Vol 106 (1) ◽  
pp. 95-99 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Francis ◽  
J Van Wart ◽  
B. Johnson

Organization ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 24 (5) ◽  
pp. 629-647 ◽  
Author(s):  
Camille Meyer ◽  
Marek Hudon

The commons are alternative social and economic practices for fostering community development and regeneration. While finance is increasingly criticized as a trigger for individualism, community currencies are one of the financial initiatives that aim to reorganize finance in the collective interest. We analyze to what extent these alternative systems allow finance to constitute common goods or ‘commons’. To this end, we investigate the commoning practices through which resources are created, distributed, and consumed in a way that promotes new collectives. We analyze the extent to which community currencies can be considered as commons. Our findings suggest that community currencies have strong collective attributes such as community building, as well as the insertion of solidarity and cooperative values in money. Finally, we inquire into the limits and ambiguities of community currencies to represent an alternative to the capitalist economy.


1997 ◽  
Vol 42 (11) ◽  
pp. 1004-1005
Author(s):  
Sybil G. Hosek ◽  
Erika D. Felix ◽  
Leonard A. Jason
Keyword(s):  

1999 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pamela R. Tenney ◽  
Michelle L. Spurlock ◽  
Susan J. Shapiro

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document