scholarly journals Channel change and bed-material transport in the Umpqua River basin, Oregon

Author(s):  
J. Rose Wallick ◽  
Jim E. O'Connor ◽  
Scott Anderson ◽  
Mackenzie K. Keith ◽  
Charles Cannon ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
J. Rose Wallick ◽  
Jim E. O'Connor ◽  
Scott Anderson ◽  
Mackenzie K. Keith ◽  
Charles Cannon ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
J. Rose Wallick ◽  
Scott W. Anderson ◽  
Charles Cannon ◽  
Jim E. O'Connor

2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Krista L. Jones ◽  
Jim E. O'Connor ◽  
Mackenzie K. Keith ◽  
Joseph F. Mangano ◽  
J. Rose Wallick

Author(s):  
Krista L. Jones ◽  
Jim E. O'Connor ◽  
Mackenzie K. Keith ◽  
Joseph F. Mangano ◽  
J. Rose Wallick

2009 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Rose Wallick ◽  
Scott W. Anderson ◽  
Charles Cannon ◽  
Jim E. O'Connor

1994 ◽  
Vol 21 (5) ◽  
pp. 770-777 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. J. Chandler ◽  
R. A. Kostaschuk

Predictions from 13 bed-material load sediment transport models are compared with 19 measurements of bed-material transport in Nottawasaga River, Ontario, using summary plots and geometric statistics. Model selection is based on recent engineering application and suitability for the flow and sediment conditions of the river. The models of Laursen (1958) and Yang (1979) perform best, followed by those of Ackers and White (1973). The models of Van Rijn (1984), Maddock (1976), Karim and Kennedy (1983), Brownlie (1981), and Yang (1973) have considerable data scatter. The models of Engelund and Hansen (1967) and Shen and Hung (1972) are the poorest predictors. Poor model performance is primarily due to overestimation of flow strength needed for particle entrainment and an excessively steep slope in the relations between flow strength and sediment transport. Key words: bed-material load transport models, test, Nottawasaga River.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document