scholarly journals Breeding Bird Community of a Primeval Temperate Forest (Białowieża National Park, Poland) at the Beginning of the 21stCentury

2006 ◽  
Vol 41 (1) ◽  
pp. 55-70 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tomasz Wesołowski ◽  
Patryk Rowiński ◽  
Cezary Mitrus ◽  
Dorota Czeszczewik
2002 ◽  
Vol 37 (1) ◽  
pp. 27-45 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tomasz Wesołowski ◽  
Ludwik Tomiałojć ◽  
Cezary Mitrus ◽  
Patryk Rowiński ◽  
Dorota Czeszczewik

2015 ◽  
Vol 50 (1) ◽  
pp. 95-120 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tomasz Wesołowski ◽  
Dorota Czeszczewik ◽  
Grzegorz Hebda ◽  
Marta Maziarz ◽  
Cezary Mitrus ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 156 (3) ◽  
pp. 613-623 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marta Maziarz ◽  
Tomasz Wesołowski ◽  
Grzegorz Hebda ◽  
Marta Cholewa

Author(s):  
Tracey Johnson ◽  
Anna Chalfoun

Approximately 50-60% of native sagebrush steppe has been lost to non-native grasses, which has contributed to population decreases for sagebrush-associated songbirds. Removal of non-native grasses and restoration treatments may return structure and function of sagebrush steppe and ultimately benefit songbirds, but their responses must be evaluated. To determine breeding songbird community responses to sagebrush restoration treatments, in 2013 we conducted bird surveys at restored plots at the Kelly Hayfields restoration area in Grand Teton National Park, Wyoming. We compared bird communities and vegetation characteristics in restored plots to plots that were unrestored and to areas of native sagebrush steppe as starting and endpoints for restoration, respectively. Unrestored plots were dominated by non-native grasses; restored plots were dominated by forbs and bare ground and had very little shrub cover (< 0.1%). Native sagebrush plots were dominated by shrubs and native bunchgrasses. Bird community composition was distinct among the three types of plots. Abundance of grassland birds was highest in unrestored plots, and was positively related to cover of non-native grass and litter depth. Abundance of shrubland birds was highest in native sagebrush, and was positively associated with shrub cover. There were very few detections of birds in restored plots, and most species were negatively associated with the high levels of bare ground that characterized these plots. Restored areas may initially (≤5 yrs) provide little breeding bird habitat, which should be accounted for when determining schedules of restoration treatments at Kelly Hayfields.


Author(s):  
Anna D. Chalfoun ◽  
Tracey N. Johnson

Approximately half of sagebrush steppe range-wide has been converted to non-native grasslands, which has contributed to population declines of sagebrush-associated songbirds.  Removal of non-native grasses and restoration treatments are time-, resource- and energy-intensive, but could lead to the return of functional habitat for sagebrush wildlife. The extent to which restoration efforts repair the structure and functionality of sagebrush steppe for different types of wildlife, however, remains largely untested. To determine breeding songbird community responses to sagebrush restoration treatments, we are conducting a longitudinal study with sampling every 5 years within restoration units at different stages of restoration in the Kelly Hayfields restoration area in Grand Teton National Park, Wyoming. Thus far, in 2013 and 2018 we compared bird and plant communities in unrestored (largely smooth brome [Bromus inermis]) units to those in various stages of restoration treatments, and to areas of native sagebrush. The sagebrush plots will serve as desired comparators for the endpoints of restoration efforts. The in-progress and recently replanted units were either dominated by bare ground (following herbicidal application) or native forbs with very little shrub cover (< 0.1%).  Native sagebrush units were dominated by shrubs and native bunchgrasses.  Bird community composition was distinct among the different unit types.  Abundance of grassland birds was highest in unrestored units, whereas the abundance of shrubland birds was highest in native sagebrush and positively associated with shrub cover.  There were very few detections of birds in recently re-seeded units. Restored areas may initially provide little breeding bird habitat, especially prior to the establishment of native bunch grasses and a mature shrub layer. Plant and bird sampling efforts will continue every five years to document how plant and bird assemblages shift over time in response to restoration efforts.   Featured photo by Matt Lavin on Flickr. https://flic.kr/p/fh7UJz


2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (1) ◽  
pp. 76-85 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristen E. Dybala ◽  
Andrew Engilis ◽  
John A. Trochet ◽  
Irene E. Engilis ◽  
Melanie L. Truan

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document