scholarly journals The new Medical Library Association research agenda: final results from a three-phase delphi study

2012 ◽  
Vol 100 (3) ◽  
pp. 214-218 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan D. Eldredge ◽  
Marie T. Ascher ◽  
Heather N. Holmes ◽  
Martha R. Harris
2005 ◽  
Vol 44 (3) ◽  
pp. 214-228 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carey Dimmitt ◽  
John C. Carey ◽  
Wendy McGannon ◽  
Ivar Henningson

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 16
Author(s):  
Live Kvale ◽  
Nils Pharo

A three-phase Delphi study was used to investigate an emerging community for research data management in Norway and their understanding and application of data management plans (DMPs). The findings reveal visions of what the DMP should be as well as different practice approaches, yet the stakeholders present common goals. This paper discusses the different perspectives on the DMP by applying Star and Griesemer’s theory of boundary objects (Star & Griesemer, 1989). The debate on what the DMP is and the findings presented are relevant to all research communities currently implementing DMP procedures and requirements. The current discussions about DMPs tend to be distant from the active researchers and limited to the needs of funders and institutions rather than to the usefulness for researchers. By analysing the DMP as a boundary object, plastic and adaptable yet with a robust identity (Star & Griesemer, 1989), and by translating between worlds where collaboration on data sharing can take place we expand the perspectives and include all stakeholders. An understanding of the DMP as a boundary object can shift the focus from shaping a DMP which fulfils funders’ requirements to enabling collaboration on data management and sharing across domains using standardised forms.


Art Therapy ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 30 (3) ◽  
pp. 114-121 ◽  
Author(s):  
Donna Kaiser ◽  
Sarah Deaver

2015 ◽  
Vol 62 (2) ◽  
pp. 180-186 ◽  
Author(s):  
L.A. Spies ◽  
J. Gray ◽  
J. Opollo ◽  
S. Mbalinda

2015 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 91-100
Author(s):  
Julie Willems ◽  
Keith Sutton ◽  
Darryl Maybery

Purpose – The Gippsland Mental Health Vacation School program has been shown to positively change student participants’ interest and attitudes to living and working in a rural area. A range of factors are impacting on the future viability of the initiative including: limitations on the number of student participants, the reusability of content, staffing, time pressures, a dwindling funding base, and a drop-off in interest in living and working in a rural setting. The paper aims to discuss these issues. Design/methodology/approach – A three-phase Delphi Study was employed to engage with expert knowledge of the program’s key stakeholder groups (student participants and service provider staff) in order to inform the initial steps of shifting the program toward a blended model, distributed across space and time. Findings – The results suggest that: first, the current mode of delivery, a week-long intensive face-to-face format, should be transitioned to a more sustainable blended learning approach that includes both on-line content and an in situ component; and second, trailing the use of social media as a mechanism to maintain student interest in rural mental health work following the vacation school. Originality/value – This study highlights how the transition to a sustainable approach to the delivery of a novel rural mental health workforce recruitment strategy was informed through a three-phase Delphi Study that involved the key stakeholders (groups of student participants and service provider staff). The study has important implications for addressing the shortage of mental health practitioners in rural areas. It will and be of interest to educators, administrators, researchers and bureaucrats.


2015 ◽  
Vol 51 (1) ◽  
pp. 83-95 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leanne Monterosso ◽  
Gail Ross-Adjie ◽  
Sinead Keeney

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document