Development of the Graded Redefined Assessment of Strength, Sensibility and Prehension (GRASSP): reviewing measurement specific to the upper limb in tetraplegia

2012 ◽  
Vol 17 (Suppl1) ◽  
pp. 65-76 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sukhvinder Kalsi-Ryan ◽  
Armin Curt ◽  
Mary C. Verrier ◽  
Michael G. Fehlings

Object Primary outcome measures for the upper limb in trials concerning human spinal cord injury (SCI) need to distinguish between functional and neurological changes and require satisfying psychometric properties for clinical application. Methods The Graded Redefined Assessment of Strength, Sensibility and Prehension (GRASSP) was developed by the International GRASSP Research and Design Team as a clinical outcome measure specific to the upper limbs for individuals with complete and incomplete tetraplegia (that is, paralysis or paresis). It can be administered across the continuum of recovery after acute cervical SCI. An international multicenter study (involving centers in North America and Europe) was conducted to apply the measure internationally and examine its applicability. Results The GRASSP is a multimodal test comprising 5 subtests for each upper limb: dorsal sensation, palmar sensation (tested with Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments), strength (tested with motor grading of 10 muscles), and prehension (distinguishes scores for qualitative and quantitative grasping). Thus, administration of the GRASSP results in 5 numerical scores that provide a comprehensive profile of upper-limb function. The established interrater and test-retest reliability for all subtests within the GRASSP range from 0.84 to 0.96 and from 0.86 to 0.98, respectively. The GRASSP is approximately 50% more sensitive (construct validity) than the International Standards of Neurological Classification of SCI (ISNCSCI) in defining sensory and motor integrity of the upper limb. The subtests show concurrence with the Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM), SCIM self-care subscales, and Capabilities of Upper Extremity Questionnaire (CUE) (the strongest concurrence to impairment is with self-perception of function [CUE], 0.57–0.83, p < 0.0001). Conclusions The GRASSP was found to demonstrate reliability, construct validity, and concurrent validity for use as a standardized upper-limb impairment measure for individuals with complete or incomplete tetraplegia. Responsiveness (follow-up from onset to 1 year postinjury) is currently being tested in international studies (in North America and Europe). The GRASSP can be administered early after injury, thus making it a tool that can be administered in acute care (in the ICU), rehabilitation, and outpatient clinics.

Author(s):  
Soshi Samejima ◽  
Abed Khorasani ◽  
Vaishnavi Ranganathan ◽  
Jared Nakahara ◽  
Nick M. Tolley ◽  
...  

Hand ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 11 (1_suppl) ◽  
pp. 84S-85S
Author(s):  
Joseph Ward ◽  
Mohammad Nassimizadeh ◽  
Simon Tan ◽  
Dominic Power

2016 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 42 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aurora Messina ◽  
Natasha Van Zyl ◽  
Michael Weymouth ◽  
Stephen Flood ◽  
Andrew Nunn ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 44 (4) ◽  
pp. 311-319
Author(s):  
Da Young Lim ◽  
Dong Min Hwang ◽  
Kang Hee Cho ◽  
Chang Won Moon ◽  
So Young Ahn

Objective To determine whether a fully immersive virtual reality (VR) intervention combined with conventional rehabilitation (CR) can improve upper limb function more than CR alone in patients with spinal cord injury (SCI), we conducted a prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial.Methods Participants were randomly assigned to either the control group (CG; n=10) or experimental group (EG; n=10). The participants in the CG received 60 minutes of conventional therapy per day, 4 days per week for 4 weeks, whereas those in the EG received 30 minutes of VR training and 30 minutes of conventional therapy per day, 4 days per week for 4 weeks. The clinical outcome measures included Medical Research Council grade, the American Spinal Injury Association upper extremity motor score (ASIA-UEMS), and scores in the Hand Strength Test, Box and Block Test, Nine-Hole Peg Test, Action Research Arm Test, and Korean version of the Spinal Cord Independence Measure (K-SCIM). The assessments were performed at the beginning (T0) and end of the intervention (T1).Results Grip power and K-SCIM score significantly improved in the EG after the intervention. When comparing differences between the groups, elbow extensor, wrist extensor, ASIA-UEMS, grip power, lateral pinch power, and palmar pinch power were all significantly improved.Conclusion VR training of upper limb function after SCI can provide an acceptable adjunctive rehabilitation method without significant adverse effects.


2021 ◽  
pp. 107-118
Author(s):  
Francescaroberta Panuccio ◽  
Marina D’Angelo ◽  
Giulia Grieco ◽  
Marco Tofani

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document