A retrospective study of iliac crest bone grafting techniques with allograft reconstruction: do patients even know which iliac crest was harvested?

2014 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
pp. 595-600 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen M. Pirris ◽  
Eric W. Nottmeier ◽  
Sherri Kimes ◽  
Michael O'Brien ◽  
Gazanfar Rahmathulla
Keyword(s):  
Bone Graft ◽  
Iliac Crest ◽  
Lumbar Fusion ◽  
Skin Incision ◽  
Bony Defect ◽  
Graft Material ◽  
Fusion Surgery ◽  
Allograft Reconstruction ◽  
Lumbar Fusion Surgery ◽  
Site Pain

Object Considerable biological research has been performed to aid bone healing in conjunction with lumbar fusion surgery. Iliac crest autograft is often considered the gold standard because it has the vital properties of being osteoconductive, osteoinductive, and osteogenic. However, graft site pain has been widely reported as the most common donor site morbidity. Autograft site pain has led many companies to develop an abundance of bone graft extenders, which have limited proof of efficacy. During the surgical consent process, many patients ask surgeons to avoid harvesting autograft because of the reported pain complications. The authors sought to study postoperative graft site pain by simply asking patients whether they knew which iliac crest was grafted when a single skin incision was made for the fusion operation. Methods Twenty-five patients underwent iliac crest autografting with allograft reconstruction during instrumented lumbar fusion surgery. In all patients the autograft was harvested through the same skin incision but with a separate fascial incision. At various points postoperatively, the patients were asked if they could tell which iliac crest had been harvested, and if so, how much pain did it cause (10-point Numeric Rating Scale). Results Most patients (64%) could not correctly determine which iliac crest had been harvested. Of the 9 patients who correctly identified the side of the autograft, 7 were only able to guess. The 2 patients who confidently identified the side of grafting had no pain at rest and mild pain with activity. One patient who incorrectly guessed the side of autografting did have significant sacroiliac joint degenerative pain bilaterally. Conclusions Results of this study indicate the inability of patients to clearly define their graft site after iliac crest autograft harvest with allograft reconstruction of the bony defect unless they have a separate skin incision. This simple, easily reproducible pilot study can be expanded into a larger, multiinstitutional investigation to provide more definitive answers regarding the ideal, safe, and cost-effective bone graft material to be used in spinal fusions.

Lumbar Fusion Surgery for Patients With Back Pain and Degenerative Disc Disease: An Observational Study From the Canadian Spine Outcomes and Research Network

2021 ◽  
pp. 219256822098547
Author(s):  
Nathan Evaniew ◽  
Ganesh Swamy ◽  
W. Bradley Jacobs ◽  
Jacques Bouchard ◽  
Roger Cho ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Back Pain ◽  
Degenerative Disc Disease ◽  
Short Form ◽  
Lumbar Fusion ◽  
Research Network ◽  
Disc Disease ◽  
Fusion Surgery ◽  
Degenerative Disc ◽  
Lumbar Fusion Surgery ◽  
Related Quality

Study Design: Uncontrolled retrospective observational study. Objectives: Surgery for patients with back pain and degenerative disc disease is controversial, and studies to date have yielded conflicting results. We evaluated the effects of lumbar fusion surgery for patients with this indication in the Canadian Spine Outcomes and Research Network (CSORN). Methods: We analyzed data that were prospectively collected from consecutive patients at 11 centers between 2015 and 2019. Our primary outcome was change in patient-reported back pain at 12 months of follow-up, and our secondary outcomes were satisfaction, disability, health-related quality of life, and rates of adverse events. Results: Among 84 patients, we observed a statistically significant improvement of back pain at 12 months that exceeded the threshold of Minimum Clinically Important Difference (MCID) (mean change -3.7 points, SD 2.6, p < 0.001, MCID = 1.2; 77% achieved MCID), and 81% reported being “somewhat” or “extremely” satisfied. We also observed improvements of Oswestry Disability Index (-17.3, SD 16.6), Short Form-12 Physical Component Summary (10.3, SD 9.6) and Short Form-12 Mental Component Summary (3.1, SD 8.3); all p < 0.001). The overall rate of adverse events was 19%. Conclusions: Among a highly selective group of patients undergoing lumbar fusion surgery for degenerative disc disease, most experienced a clinically significant improvement of back pain as well as significant improvements of disability and health-related quality of life, with high satisfaction at 1 year of follow-up. These findings suggest that surgery for this indication may provide some benefit, and that further research is warranted.

Use of a nano-hydroxyapatite/polyamide composite in anterior cervical subtotal corpectomy and fusion

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (9) ◽  
pp. 1491-1496
Author(s):  
Xiaojiang Li ◽  
Xudong Zhang ◽  
Shanshan Dong ◽  
Haijun Li ◽  
Chunlan Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Graft ◽  
Vertebral Body ◽  
Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy ◽  
Interbody Fusion ◽  
Japanese Orthopaedic Association ◽  
Fusion Rate ◽  
Graft Material ◽  
Improvement Rate ◽  
Fusion Surgery ◽  
Cervical Vertebral Body

This study aimed to explore the safety and efficacy of using nano-hydroxyapatite/polyamide (N-HA/PA) composite in anterior cervical vertebral body subtotal corpectomy and interbody fusion. Total 50 patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy were enrolled to undergo anterior cervical spondylectomy. Bone graft pedicles were compounded with N-HA/PA and intervertebral body fusion was performed. Study outcomes included surgical efficacy and the degree of fusion. Patients in whom vertebral body fusion was performed with N-HA/PA composite pedicles had significantly improved symptoms. The postoperative Japanese Orthopaedic Association scores increased to 18.56±4.37 from 11.37±3.52, reflecting an improvement rate of 87.3%. The composite pedicle fusion rate was 96.4%. Therefore, N-HA/PA composite pedicle as a bone graft material in fusion surgery provides significant therapeutic efficacy. Moreover, the composite pedicle fusion rate is high, making it ideal for anterior cervical vertebral body subtotal corpectomy and fusion.

The validity of using activity monitors to detect step count after lumbar fusion surgery

2018 ◽  
Vol 42 (6) ◽  
pp. 863-868 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah J. Gilmore ◽  
Megan Davidson ◽  
Andrew J. Hahne ◽  
Jodie A. McClelland
Keyword(s):  
Lumbar Fusion ◽  
Step Count ◽  
Fusion Surgery ◽  
Activity Monitors ◽  
Lumbar Fusion Surgery

scholarly journals Effect of the duration of chronic low back pain on pain sensitivity of patients undergoing lumbar fusion surgery

Pain medicine ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 8-15
Author(s):  
Mei-ping Qian ◽  
Mei-rong Dong ◽  
Fang Kang ◽  
Juan Li
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Pain ◽  
Low Back Pain ◽  
Back Pain ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Chronic Low Back Pain ◽  
Pain Sensitivity ◽  
Lumbar Fusion ◽  
Low Back ◽  
Fusion Surgery ◽  
Lumbar Fusion Surgery

Background: chronic low back pain is a serious social problem. In recent years, patients who choose lumbar fusion surgery due to chronic low back pain has been increasing. Pre-existing chronic pain has been associated with severe postoperative pain. In this study, we have sought to prospectively analyze the association between the duration of chronic low back pain and pain sensitivity after lumbar fusion surgery. Methods: 400 patients who underwent lumbar fusion surgery were divided into three groups based on the duration of chronic pain. During the first postoperative day, the maximum pain scores of each patient day and night, the pain scores at the day of discharge, the consumption of postoperative analgesics and the length of hospital stay were recorded. Results: of 400 patients recruited, 369 patients completed the experiment. There was no significant difference in gender, age, height, weight, pre-operative pain at rest, and operation time in the three groups. During the day, the pain sensitivity of the three groups were 1.71 ± 0.66, 2.40 ± 0.74, 2.90 ± 0.80. During the night, the pain sensitivity of the three groups were 3.45 ± 0.81, 4.31 ± 1.06, 4.86 ± 1.05. At the day of discharge, the pain sensitivity of three groups were 1.26 ± 0.46, 1.47 ± 0.58, 1.96 ± 0.64. There were significant differences in pain sensitivity among the three groups during the day and night on the first postoperative day and at the day of discharge (p < 0.05). The length of hospital stay (7.31 ± 1.36 days, 8.82 ± 1.48 days, 9.60 ± 1.61 days) and analgesic consumption (25.04 ± 36.56 mg, 33.52 ± 24.04 mg, 45.15 ± 24.89 mg, morphine equivalent) were also significant differences (p < 0.05). Conclusion: we found the duration of chronic low back pain before lumbar fusion surgery affects patient’ postoperative pain sensitivity, consumption of analgesic drugs and hospital stay. The longer the preoperative chronic pain lasts, the higher the postoperative VAS score is, the more analgesic drugs were consumed, and the longer hospital stay is.

Preoperative and Postoperative Factors and Laboratory Values Predicting Outcome in Patients Undergoing Lumbar Fusion Surgery

2016 ◽  
Vol 92 ◽  
pp. 323-338 ◽  
Author(s):  
Severina Leu ◽  
Maria Kamenova ◽  
Arne Mehrkens ◽  
Luigi Mariani ◽  
Stefan Schären ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lumbar Fusion ◽  
Fusion Surgery ◽  
Lumbar Fusion Surgery ◽  
Laboratory Values ◽  
Predicting Outcome

scholarly journals Leg pain and psychological variables predict outcome 2–3 years after lumbar fusion surgery

2011 ◽  
Vol 20 (10) ◽  
pp. 1626-1634 ◽  
Author(s):  
Allan D. Abbott ◽  
Raija Tyni-Lenné ◽  
Rune Hedlund
Keyword(s):  
Lumbar Fusion ◽  
Leg Pain ◽  
Psychological Variables ◽  
Fusion Surgery ◽  
Lumbar Fusion Surgery
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document