Pain and discomfort in violation of bowel movements in children – an actual problem

Pain and discomfort during bowel movements in children are among the most common symptoms in the modern civilized world. The most common cause of these symptoms is chronic constipation, which is often treated by a pediatrician or pediatric gastroenterologist. In differen­tial diagnosis, it is very important to distinguish between chronic symptomatic constipation and functional (without an organic basis), which are most common in childhood. Organic causes of constipation are usually dealt with in cooperation with specialized specialists. The main patho­physiological mechanisms of functional constipation are stress, pain during emptying, and fear of further painful bowel movements. The clinical picture is dominated by in­frequent and difficult defecation of a large amount of hard stools. If the history, laboratory and other additional stud­ies indicate functional constipation, and there are no warn­ing signs of chronic symptomatic constipation, complex treatment can be started. Therapy includes psychological preparation of the patient and his family, working with the correct technique of defecation, dietary and regimen mea­sures, sufficient physical activity, the use of osmotic lax­atives. The presence of warning signs requires a rational differential diagnostic procedure, which varies depending on the age of the child.

A comparative study of caudal anesthesia with bupivacaine v/s bupivacaine with dexmedetomidine in lower abdominal surgeries in pediatric age group

Background: caudal anaesthesia has short­term effect. Alpha­2 adenoreceptors when used as adjuvant to local anaesthetic in children prolongs analgesic duration. The study is aimed to assess the efficacy of addition of dexme­detomidine with Bupivacaine in caudal block for extending postoperative analgesia and its safety profile in pediatric infra­umbilical surgeries.Method: the prospective interventional longitudinal double blinded study was conducted on 60 patients randomly divided into two groups by simple lottery method: group B who received (0.25 %) bupivacaine 1 ml/kg plus 1 ml nor­mal saline (NS), and those in group BD who received (0.25 %) bupivacaine 1 ml/kg plus 0.5 μg/kg dexmedetomidine in 1 ml NS. Post­surgery, both groups were compared in R studio v1.2.5001. Association between the adverse effect and other variables (age, gender, type of surgery, groups) were assessed by Multiple linear regression.Results: in group BD, duration of analgesia prolonged significantly (P < 0.05). In group BD, FLACC score at initial four hours and at 12th hour was significantly less (P < 0.05). Group B was more likely to receive high number of rescue analgesia (P = 0.0005; OR = 11.769). No significant difference was observed concerning hemodynamics, respiratory parameters and adverse effect between both groups (P > 0.05). Conclusion: in children, dexmedetomidine when used along with bupivacaine prolongs postoperative analgesia du­ration, without any significant side effects.

Multicenter study of the effectiveness of postoperative pain relief in Ukraine using paracetаmol in surgical hospitals – “ROZUM”

This article is devoted to the effectiveness of postoperative pain relief in surgical hospitals in Ukraine. Multicenter study of the effectiveness of postoperative pain relief in Ukraine using paracetаmol in surgical hospitals – ROZUM is descibed. The effectiveness of multimodal analgesia and other analgesia in the postoperative period has been determined. Predictors of inadequate pain relief in surgical patients were identified, and the risks of pain syndrome development in a surgical hospital were assessed. The use of paracetamol in the schemes of multim

Experience of Dexmedetomidine using for intraoperative analgosedation during ophthalmic operations

Background. The aim of the study is to evaluate the quality and safety of the sedative effect of anesthesia in ambulant ophthalmic surgery by using continuous intravenous infu­sion of Dexmedetomidine. Materials and Methods. Patients were randomized into groups by age (people from 65 to 75 years old, old age 76 years, middle age, young people, children), by gender (men, women). The physical status of patients was assessed using the ASA scale and the dynamics of vegetatic activity by the Kerdo index. Sedation was assessed using the Richmond Sedation Scale RASS.Results. It was found that the difference in the frequency of adverse effects of the appointment of Dexmedetomidine clearly confirms the need to adjust the dose of Dexmede­tomidine, depending on the state of the autonomic nervous system. The use of Dexmedetomidine according to the rec­ommendations made it possible to achieve a safe level of sedation and eliminate side effects in ambulant ophthalmic surgery.Conclusions: Parenteral continuous infusion of Dexmedetomidine pro­vides an effective level of sedation for ambulant ophthalmic surgery and maintaining patient­surgeon contact. Safety is confirmed by a low level of critical incidents, no respiratory depression at the target sedation level. The patency of the upper airways was better compared to previous experience with propofol.

Continuous fentanyl infusion reduces intra-abdominal pressure, postoperative pain and normalizes lungs’ mechanical changes in newborn with viscera-abdominal disproportion in early post-operative period

We aimed to study the influence of prolonged administration of fentanyl on postoperative pain, intra­ab­dominal pressure and mechanical lungs’ changes that may happen in neonates in early post­operative period. 30 newborns (in the period from January 2017 to May 2021) with gastroschisis were divided into two groups ac­cordingly to the method of analgesia (14 – morphine hydrochloride; 16 – prolonged infusion of fentanyl). Lungs’ mechanical characteristics, effectiveness of post­operative analgesia, abdominal wall relaxation was studied by monitoring of dynamic compliance (Cdyn), pressure and flow­volume loops, capnography. Apprising analgesia sta­tus, we measured hemodynamic, SаO2, blood level of cortizol, C­reactive protein (CRP), glucose, analyzed post­operative pain syndrome using visual analogue scales (VAS). Intra­abdominal pressure (IAP) was controlled by Cron. For statistic analysis we used Student’s t­test. In the group with morphine, thete was the increase of IAP by 11–12 cm H2O, being stable during some period of time, and also variable levels of pain according to VAS, the in­creasing of CRP from 0.8 ± 0.25 mg/dl by 5 mg/dl, cortisol by 674.4 nmol/l, and blood glucosae rate – 7.4 mmol/l. Periods with high traumatic effects and poor analgesia (morphine group) reasoned the increasing IAP, step by step dynamic compliance decreasing in 3.4 times, resistance increasing in 2.42 times and PIP rising till 22 cm H2O. Di­rect correlation between IAP increase and lungs’ mechanical changes took place. The study has demonstrated that prolonged administration of fentanyl prevented high increase of IAP, CRP, levels of glucose and cortizol and changes of VAS data, lungs’ mechanical characteristics.

Efficiency and safety of use of the extemporal inhalation anesthetic “Sevoflurane Chemoteka” for anesthetic management in abdominal surgery

Sevoflurane is the most widely used modern inhalational anesthetic in the world. Sevoflurane is the “gold standard” for anesthetic management now. The article discusses the modern possibilities of using inhalation anesthesia, and the experience of using the domestic inhalational anesthetic “Sevoflurane Chemoteka” by the authors from the point of view of its effectiveness and safety.

Anesthesia for knee arthroscopy: which nerves should be blocked?

Nowadays knee arthroscopy is the most common orthopedic procedure. It is used to diagnose and treat various pathological conditions. Usually knee arthroscopy can be performed using spinal anesthesia. The article presents a successful experience of using a combined technique, which consist in a unilateral subarachnoid anesthesia with additional adductor canal block and blocks of the articular branches of the sciatic and obturator nerves.

Intravenous versus perineural dexmedetomidine in prolongation of analgesia with regional anesthesia: a meta-analysis and systematic review

Background and Objective. It is unclear whether perineural administration offers advantages when compared to intravenous dexmedetomidine in local anesthesia. To compare the efficacy of perineural versus intravenous dexmedetomidine as local anesthetic adjuvant, we conducted the meta analysis and systematic review. Materials and Methods. Two researchers searched MEDLINE, OVID, PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central, Web of Science and Wanfang data for randomized controlled trials comparing the effect of intravenous versus perineural dexmedetomidine as local anesthetic adjuvant without any language restrictions. Results. We identified 14 randomized controlled trials (801 patients). The results revealed that the duration of analgesia (SMD: -1.76, 95 % CI, [-2.7, -0.83] P = 0.000, I2 = 96 %), the duration of sensory block (SMD:- 3.99, 95 % CI, [-5.88, -2.0], P = 0.000, I2 = 97.6 %), the duration of motor block (SMD: -1.6, 95 % CI, [-2.78, -0.41] P = 0.008, I 2 = 95.5 %) were significantly longer in the perineural group, when compared to systematic dexmedetomidine. The onset time of sensory block (SMD: 1.55, 95 % CI, [0.16, 2.94] P = 0.028, I2 = 96.7 %) and the onset time of motor block (SMD: 0.84, 95 % CI, [0.17, 1.5] P = 0.013, I2 = 88.3 %) were shorter in perineural group compared to intrave nous dexmedetomidine. Meanwhile, analgesic consumption in 24 hours (SMD: 0.37, 95 % CI, [0.05, 0.69] P = 0.023, I 2 = 55.6 %) and the incidence of patients of Ramsay Sedation Scale > 3 (RR: 3.8, 95 % CI, [1.45, 9.97] P = 0.000, I 2 = 26.9 %), hypotension (RR: 1.74, 95 % CI, [1.15, 2.65] P= 0.009, I2 = 32.7 %) and bradycardia (RR: 3.71, 95 % CI, [1.27, 10.86] P = 0.017, I2 = 0 %) were lower in perineural dexmedetomidine compared to the intravenous group. Conclusions. Our meta-analysis generates the evidence that perineural dexmedetomidine is a superior adminstration for prolonging the duration of analgesia. Perineural dexmedetomidine also shows the advantages in duration of sensory block and the onset time of sensory and motor block, when compared to the intravenous administration. Simultaneously, dexmedetomidine as a local anesthetic adjuvant for perineural injection may be much safer than intravenous application because of the lower incidence of patients of Ramsay Sedation Scale > 3 and lower incidence of hypotension and bradycardia.

Ropivacaine as the drug of choice for regional anesthesia: why so?

While writing the article, we analyzed all the studies related to ropivacaine for the first half of 2021, which were published in PubMed. Previous review articles on ropivacaine were also analyzed. Purpose: collection and analysis of the latest research results on ropivacaine. Assessment of the place of ropivacaine in modern regional anesthesia.

Use of hyaluronic acid preparations for treatment of osteoarthritis of major ligaments

The authors of the article analyzed the experience of domestic and foreign experts in the effectiveness of the use of HA preparations in the treatment of osteoarthritis of major ligaments. Background and Objective. To analyze the literature sources in order to determine the effectiveness of the use of HA preparations in the treatment of osteoarthritis of major ligaments. Materials and methods. Articles in specialized scientific journals and collections, Internet resource. Results. The analysis of literature sources determined the important role of HA preparations in the supplying and functioning of the articular cartilage. Researchers are inclined to believe that the ideal HA preparation should be as close as possible to the physiological HA of the synovial fluid of the joint. The developed domestic drug Arthro-Patch fully corresponds to these parameters. Conclusions. The use of modern injectable HA preparations is advisable at stages 1–3 of OA. Anti-inflammatory effect of HA preparations makes it possible to reduce the dose and time of administration of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and, as a consequence, reduce the risk of developing many adverse side effects of NSAIDs. The high level of safety of HA preparations, the absence of serious side effects during their long-term use determine their widespread use in the clinical practice of modern orthopedists.